Literature DB >> 10943925

The saturation loss for plane parallel ionization chambers at high dose per pulse values.

A Piermattei1, S D Canne, L Azario, A Russo, A Fidanzio, R Micelit, A T Soriani, A Orvieto, M Fantini.   

Abstract

The use of plane parallel ionization chambers with electron beams with high dose per pulse entails dose uncertainties due to the overestimation of the ion recombination factor, k, up to 20% if conventional dosimetric protocols are used. In this work MD-55-2 radiochromic films have been used as reference dosimeters to obtain dose to water per pulse DGAF(w) values for three Novac7 (Hitesys) electron beams of E0 = 5.8 MeV. However, the beam calibration by MD-55-2 films is time consuming and the use of plane parallel chambers is fundamental for a periodic quality control procedure. Three plane parallel chambers have been used and the general formula for the k determination has been tested using the calibration doses, DGAF(w). In particular, consistent ion recombination factors ksat(V0) (with the ion chamber polarized at V0), that follow the Boag theory, have been estimated at different dose per pulse values for the three plane parallel ionization chambers. This means that at present any ion chamber needs a specific ksat (V0) determination by using a reference dosimeter for which the response is independent of the dose rate. An accurate determination of ksat(V0), using a reference quality beam, can be used to determine the dose to water per pulse for electron beams of different quality and geometrical configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10943925     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/7/312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Ion recombination correction factors (P(ion)) for Varian TrueBeam high-dose-rate therapy beams.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Richard Popple; Andrea Molineu; David S Followill
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  Present state and issues in IORT Physics.

Authors:  Frank W Hensley
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Comparing the dosimetric characteristics of the electron beam from dedicated intraoperative and conventional radiotherapy accelerators.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Baghani; Seyed Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri; Seyed Rabi Mahdavi; Mohammad Esmail Akbari; Hamid Reza Mirzaei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration.

Authors:  Pablo Castro; Feliciano García-Vicente; Cristina Mínguez; Alejandro Floriano; David Sevillano; Leopoldo Pérez; Juan J Torres
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.