Literature DB >> 10943731

Propofol narcosis dissociates human intrathalamic and cortical high-frequency (> 400 hz) SEP components.

F Klostermann1, T Funk, J Vesper, R Siedenberg, G Curio.   

Abstract

Human somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) contain a brief burst of high-frequency wavelets (>400 Hz) presumably reflecting rapidly repeated population spikes of as-yet undetermined origin. To study state-dependent response changes, SEP after electric median nerve stimulation were recorded in six Parkinson's disease patients perioperatively from intrathalamic electrode implants, and in five non-implanted patients from scalp electrodes, before and under propofol narcosis. In all intrathalamic recordings burst amplitude and intraburst frequency (approximately 950 Hz) proved to be almost stable under propofol administration. In strong contrast, the scalp burst (640 Hz) was significantly slowed (480 Hz) under propofol narcosis, and its amplitude reduced to 28% of the pre-propofol baseline. Low-frequency SEP components which underly the burst at thalamic (P16) and cortical level (N20) did not change significantly. This dissociation of bursts indicates neuronal generators showing different sensitivities to propofol narcosis, with a robust thalamic response and a state-dependent cortical contribution, possibly from pyramidal chattering cells and/or inhibitory interneurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10943731     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200008030-00051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  4 in total

1.  Identification of target areas for deep brain stimulation in human basal ganglia substructures based on median nerve sensory evoked potential criteria.

Authors:  F Klostermann; J Vesper; G Curio
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Different Mode of Afferents Determines the Frequency Range of High Frequency Activities in the Human Brain: Direct Electrocorticographic Comparison between Peripheral Nerve and Direct Cortical Stimulation.

Authors:  Katsuya Kobayashi; Riki Matsumoto; Masao Matsuhashi; Kiyohide Usami; Akihiro Shimotake; Takeharu Kunieda; Takayuki Kikuchi; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Susumu Miyamoto; Hidenao Fukuyama; Ryosuke Takahashi; Akio Ikeda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol.

Authors:  Sergey Burnos; Tommaso Fedele; Olivier Schmid; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Johannes Sarnthein
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 4.  Understanding the Effects of Anesthesia on Cortical Electrophysiological Recordings: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sorrenti; Claudia Cecchetto; Marta Maschietto; Stefano Fortinguerra; Alessandro Buriani; Stefano Vassanelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.