Literature DB >> 10943682

Why can't you tickle yourself?

S J Blakemore1, D Wolpert, C Frith.   

Abstract

It is well known that you cannot tickle yourself. Here, we discuss the proposal that such attenuation of self-produced tactile stimulation is due to the sensory predictions made by an internal forward model of the motor system. A forward model predicts the sensory consequences of a movement based on the motor command. When a movement is self-produced, its sensory consequences can be accurately predicted, and this prediction can be used to attenuate the sensory effects of the movement. Studies are reviewed that demonstrate that as the discrepancy between predicted and actual sensory feedback increases during self-produced tactile stimulation there is a concomitant decrease in the level of sensory attenuation and an increase in tickliness. Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that this sensory attenuation might be mediated by somatosensory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex: these areas are activated less by a self-produced tactile stimulus than by the same stimulus when it is externally produced. Furthermore, evidence suggests that the cerebellum might be involved in generating the prediction of the sensory consequences of movement. Finally, recent evidence suggests that this predictive mechanism is abnormal in patients with auditory hallucinations and/or passivity experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10943682     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200008030-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  206 in total

1.  Assessing corollary discharge in humans using noninvasive neurophysiological methods.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Brian J Roach; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Decorrelation control by the cerebellum achieves oculomotor plant compensation in simulated vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill; James V Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The relative importance of retinal error and prediction in saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency.

Authors:  James W Moore; Diane Ruge; Dorit Wenke; John Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Motor abilities in autism: a review using a computational context.

Authors:  Emma Gowen; Antonia Hamilton
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-02

8.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dissociation between key processes of social cognition in autism: impaired mentalizing but intact sense of agency.

Authors:  Nicole David; Astrid Gawronski; Natacha S Santos; Wolfgang Huff; Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt; Albert Newen; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-08-21

Review 10.  Sociomotor action control.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Lisa Weller; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.