Literature DB >> 10942815

Immunocompatibility and biocompatibility of cell delivery systems.

B Ríhová1.   

Abstract

Immunoisolation therapy overcomes important disadvantages of implanting free cells. By mechanically blocking immune attacks, synthetic membranes around grafted cells should obviate the need for immunosuppression. The membrane used for encapsulation must be biocompatible and immunocompatible to the recipient and also to the encapsulated graft. The ability of the host to accept the implanted graft depends not only on the material used for encapsulation, but also on the defense reaction of the recipient, which is very individual. Such a reaction usually starts as absorption of cell-adhesive proteins, immunoglobulins, complement components, growth factors and some other proteins on the surface of the device. The absorption of proteins is difficult to avoid, but the amount and specificity of absorbed proteins can be controlled to some extent by selection and modification of the device material. If the adsorption of proteins to the surface of the implanted material is reduced, the overgrowth of the device with fibroblast-like and macrophage-like cells is also reduced. Cell adhesion at the surface of the implanted device is, in addition to the selected polymeric material, greatly influenced by the device content. Xenografts trigger a more vigorous inflammatory reaction than allografts, most probably due to the release of antigenic products from encapsulated deteriorated and dying cells which diffuse through the membrane and activate adhering immune cells. There is an evident effect of autoimmune status on the fate of the encapsulated graft. While encapsulated xenogeneic islets readily reverse streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice, the same xenografts are short-functioning in NOD autoimmune diabetes-prone mice. Autoantibodies, to which most devices are impermeable, are not involved. Among the cytotoxic factors which are responsible for the limited survival of the encapsulated graft the most important are cytokines and perhaps some other low-molecular-weight factors released by activated macrophages at the surface of the encapsulating membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10942815     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00054-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  22 in total

1.  Use of Encapsulated Stem Cells to Overcome the Bottleneck of Cell Availability for Cell Therapy Approaches.

Authors:  D Freimark; P Pino-Grace; S Pohl; C Weber; C Wallrapp; P Geigle; R Pörtner; P Czermak
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  Challenges and emerging technologies in the immunoisolation of cells and tissues.

Authors:  John T Wilson; Elliot L Chaikof
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Species and density of implant surface chemistry affect the extent of foreign body reactions.

Authors:  Ashwin Nair; Ling Zou; Dhiman Bhattacharyya; Richard B Timmons; Liping Tang
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 4.  Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility.

Authors:  Paul Thevenot; Wenjing Hu; Liping Tang
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Structural properties of polysaccharide-based microcapsules for soft tissue regeneration.

Authors:  F Munarin; P Petrini; S Farè; M C Tanzi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: current challenges to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Yoshinori Onuki; Upkar Bhardwaj; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

7.  Rapid biocompatibility analysis of materials via in vivo fluorescence imaging of mouse models.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Bratlie; Tram T Dang; Stephen Lyle; Matthias Nahrendorf; Ralph Weissleder; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cell encapsulation and oxygenation in nanoporous microcontainers.

Authors:  Barjor Gimi; Joonbum Kwon; Li Liu; Yang Su; Krishnamurthy Nemani; Krutarth Trivedi; Yonghao Cui; Behroze Vachha; Ralph Mason; Wenchuang Hu; Jeong-Bong Lee
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Profiles of carbohydrate ligands associated with adsorbed proteins on self-assembled monolayers of defined chemistries.

Authors:  Sucharita P Shankar; Inn Inn Chen; Benjamin G Keselowsky; Andrés J García; Julia E Babensee
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 10.  Stem cell-based therapies for cancer treatment: separating hope from hype.

Authors:  Daniel W Stuckey; Khalid Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.