Literature DB >> 10941860

Role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice.

P Gambitta1, A Indriolo, C Grosso, Z Pirone, P Colombo, R Arcidiacono.   

Abstract

The present study evaluates the role of oesophageal manometry in clinical practice. Over 5 years, 347 consecutive patients were evaluated in our oesophageal laboratory. The reasons for referral were: dysphagia (11.5%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) (46.7%), non-cardiac chest pain (28.5%), connective tissue disease (6.9%) and other symptomatology (6.3%). Patients were classified into the following five groups according to the referral diagnosis: dysphagia (40 patients), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) (162 patients), non-cardiac chest pain (99 patients), connective tissue disease (24 patients) and other symptomatology (22 patients). Abnormalities in oesophageal motility were detected in 90% of patients with dysphagia, in 40.1% of patients with GORD, in 47.5% of subjects with non-cardiac chest pain, in 45.8% of patients with connective tissue disease and in 18.2% of subjects with other symptomatology. The high prevalence of abnormalities in the dysphagia group was statistically significant (p < 0.001), and the range of 95% confidence intervals (0.81-0.99) suggests that the value found may be a reasonably good estimate of percentage of anomalies detectable in the dysphagia patient population. In the dysphagia group, the initial diagnosis was confirmed in 40% of patients and changed in 52.5%; in only 7.5% of cases were the manometry results not relevant for determining an appropriate diagnosis. Manometry substantially contributed to patients receiving the correct treatment in 82.5% of cases (p < 0.001 among all groups). In the GORD group and in the non-cardiac chest pain group, the results of manometry were not relevant for confirming or changing a diagnosis in 59.8% and 53.5% of cases respectively; nevertheless, in both groups, on the basis of manometry results, the treatment was changed in 42.5% of patients (p < 0.01 vs. other symptomatology group). In conclusion, on the basis of the present data, we can emphasize the usefulness of oesophageal manometry assessment in patients with dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain, with negative routine examinations, and also in patients with refractory GORD who have been considered for antireflux surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10941860     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.1999.00013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  2 in total

1.  Dysphagia in the elderly.

Authors:  Muhammad Aslam; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-12

2.  Does Chicago Classification address Symptom Correlation with High-resolution Esophageal Manometry?

Authors:  Mayank Jain; Melpakkam Srinivas; Piyush Bawane; Jayanthi Venkataraman
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.