Literature DB >> 10941731

Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay and comparison to other serological assays for the detection of serum antibodies to Brucella abortus in bison.

D Gall1, K Nielsen, L Forbes, D Davis, P Elzer, S Olsen, S Balsevicius, L Kelly, P Smith, S Tan, D Joly.   

Abstract

A number of serological tests were compared for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in bison (Bison bison). The performance of the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) in both the preliminary evaluation and a subsequent blind validation indicated that this test was the most suitable for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in bison. The sensitivity and specificity in the preliminary evaluation were 92.1% and 99.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in a subsequent blind study were 96.3% and 97.6%, respectively. In a double blind study conducted on bison vaccinated with B. abortus strain 19, the data suggests that the FPA can differentiate bison infected with B. abortus from bison vaccinated with B. abortus strain 19. Both the indirect immunoassay (IELISA) and the competitive immunoassay (CELISA) performed nearly as well as the FPA. The buffered antigen plate agglutination test (BPAT) and the complement fixation test (CFT) did not perform as well as the FPA, CELISA or the IELISA in both studies. The FPA is a homogeneous assay eliminating the washing steps and reducing incubation to minutes rather than hours saving on time, equipment, materials, reagents and cost. These attributes, together, with its excellent sensitivity and specificity make the FPA an attractive test for the detection of serum antibodies to Brucella abortus in bison.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10941731     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-36.3.469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  5 in total

1.  Spatial distribution and risk factors of Brucellosis in Iberian wild ungulates.

Authors:  Pilar M Muñoz; Mariana Boadella; Maricruz Arnal; María J de Miguel; Miguel Revilla; David Martínez; Joaquín Vicente; Pelayo Acevedo; Alvaro Oleaga; Francisco Ruiz-Fons; Clara M Marín; José M Prieto; José de la Fuente; Marta Barral; Montserrat Barberán; Daniel Fernández de Luco; José M Blasco; Christian Gortázar
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  An outbreak of bovine tuberculosis in an intensively managed conservation herd of wild bison in the Northwest Territories.

Authors:  Chelsea G Himsworth; Brett T Elkin; John S Nishi; Aleksija S Neimanis; Gary A Wobeser; Claude Turcotte; Fredrick A Leighton
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Clinical Detection of Brucella Infection.

Authors:  B Suo; J He; C Wu; D Wang
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 0.804

4.  Serologic Survey of Snowshoe Hares (Lepus americanus) in the Greater Yellowstone Area for Brucellosis, Tularemia, and Snowshoe Hare Virus.

Authors:  Dan Tyers; Jeremy Zimmer; Kristen Lewandowski; Steve Hennager; John Young; Ryan Pappert; Amanda Panella; Olga Kosoy
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.535

5.  Comparison of diagnostic tests for the detection of Brucella spp. in camel sera.

Authors:  Mayada M Gwida; Adel H El-Gohary; Falk Melzer; Herbert Tomaso; Uwe Rösler; Ulrich Wernery; Renate Wernery; Mandy C Elschner; Iahtasham Khan; Meike Eickhoff; Daniel Schöner; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-12-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.