BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization is an important proarrhythmic factor. QT dispersion has been proposed to reflect the inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization, but a poor reproducibility limits its clinical applicability. Reliable noninvasive methods to quantify abnormalities in ventricular repolarization are still lacking. The T-loop morphology analysis is a novel method aimed at quantifying ventricular repolarization. HYPOTHESIS: To test the ability of the T-loop morphology analysis to discriminate between hypertensive patients and healthy subjects, 105 hypertensive patients (mean age 63.6 +/- 12.3 years) and 110 healthy controls (mean age 49.7 +/- 14.3 years) were evaluated. METHODS: The maximum QT interval (QT maximum), the minimum QT interval (QT minimum), and their difference (QT dispersion) were calculated from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in both study groups. X, Y, and Z leads were reconstructed from the 12-lead ECG, and the amplitude of the maximum T vector (T amplitude) and the angle between the maximum T vector and X axis (T angle) were calculated from the projection of the T loop in the frontal plane. RESULTS: T amplitude (p < 0.001), T angle (p = 0.05), and QT dispersion (p = 0.04) were significantly different between hypertensive patients and controls, while QT maximum (p = 0.14) and QT minimum (p = 0.35) did not differ between the groups. T amplitude was the only marker which differed between hypertensive patients without ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy and controls (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: T-loop features and particularly T amplitude are significantly different between hypertensive patients and healthy controls and may serve as early markers of repolarization abnormalities in a hypertensive population.
BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization is an important proarrhythmic factor. QT dispersion has been proposed to reflect the inhomogeneity of ventricular repolarization, but a poor reproducibility limits its clinical applicability. Reliable noninvasive methods to quantify abnormalities in ventricular repolarization are still lacking. The T-loop morphology analysis is a novel method aimed at quantifying ventricular repolarization. HYPOTHESIS: To test the ability of the T-loop morphology analysis to discriminate between hypertensivepatients and healthy subjects, 105 hypertensivepatients (mean age 63.6 +/- 12.3 years) and 110 healthy controls (mean age 49.7 +/- 14.3 years) were evaluated. METHODS: The maximum QT interval (QT maximum), the minimum QT interval (QT minimum), and their difference (QT dispersion) were calculated from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in both study groups. X, Y, and Z leads were reconstructed from the 12-lead ECG, and the amplitude of the maximum T vector (T amplitude) and the angle between the maximum T vector and X axis (T angle) were calculated from the projection of the T loop in the frontal plane. RESULTS: T amplitude (p < 0.001), T angle (p = 0.05), and QT dispersion (p = 0.04) were significantly different between hypertensivepatients and controls, while QT maximum (p = 0.14) and QT minimum (p = 0.35) did not differ between the groups. T amplitude was the only marker which differed between hypertensivepatients without ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy and controls (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: T-loop features and particularly T amplitude are significantly different between hypertensivepatients and healthy controls and may serve as early markers of repolarization abnormalities in a hypertensive population.
Authors: Dragan B Djordjević; Ivan S Tasić; Svetlana I Kostić; Bojana N Stamenković; Aleksandar D Djordjević; Dragan B Lović Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2017-12-16 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Georgeta D Vaidean; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Eric A Whitsel; Lloyd E Chambless; Aaron R Folsom; Wayne D Rosamond; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Richard S Crow; Gerardo Heiss Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2005-01-11 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Heidi Hintsala; Tuomas V Kenttä; Mikko Tulppo; Antti Kiviniemi; Heikki V Huikuri; Matti Mäntysaari; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaannemi; Risto Bloigu; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Riitta Antikainen; Hannu Rintamäki; Jouni J K Jaakkola; Tiina M Ikäheimo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alan Sugrue; Ammar M Killu; Christopher V DeSimone; Anwar A Chahal; Josh C Vogt; Vaclav Kremen; JoJo Hai; David O Hodge; Nancy G Acker; Jeffrey B Geske; Michael J Ackerman; Steve R Ommen; Grace Lin; Peter A Noseworthy; Peter A Brady Journal: Open Heart Date: 2017-02-23
Authors: Fernando De la Garza Salazar; Maria Elena Romero Ibarguengoitia; José Ramón Azpiri López; Arnulfo González Cantú Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240