Literature DB >> 10940527

Prevention of experimentally induced heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) infections in dogs and cats with a single topical application of selamectin.

T L McTier1, D J Shanks, P Watson, J W McCall, C Genchi, R H Six, C A Thomas, S K Dickin, G Pengo, T G Rowan, A D Jernigan.   

Abstract

In a series of six controlled studies (four in dogs, two in cats), heartworm-free dogs and cats were inoculated with Dirofilaria immitis larvae (L(3)) prior to topical treatment with the novel avermectin selamectin or a negative control containing inert formulation ingredients (vehicle). Selamectin and negative-control treatments were administered topically to the skin at the base of the neck in front of the scapulae. In dogs, selamectin was applied topically at dosages of 3 or 6mgkg(-1) at 30 days post-inoculation (PI), or of 3 or 6mgkg(-1) at 45 days PI, or of 6mgkg(-1) at 60 days PI. Cats were treated topically with unit doses providing a minimum dosage of 6mgkg(-1) selamectin at 30 days PI. Of the animals that were treated 30 days PI, some dogs were bathed with water or shampoo between 2 and 96h after treatment, and some cats were bathed with shampoo at 24h after treatment. Between 140 and 199 days PI, the animals were euthanized and examined for adult D. immitis. Adult heartworms developed in all control dogs (geometric mean count, 18.7 worms) and in 88% of control cats (geometric mean count, 2.1 worms). Selamectin was 100% effective in preventing heartworm development in dogs when administered as a single topical dose of 3 or 6mgkg(-1) at 30 days after infection, 3 or 6mgkg(-1) at 45 days after infection, or 6mgkg(-1) at 60 days after infection. Selamectin was 100% effective against heartworm infections in cats when administered as a single topical unit dose of 6mgkg(-1). Bathing with water or shampoo between 2 and 96h after treatment did not reduce the efficacy of selamectin as a heartworm prophylactic in dogs. Likewise, bathing with shampoo at 24h after treatment did not reduce the efficacy of selamectin in cats. These studies demonstrated that, at the recommended dosage and treatment interval, a single topical administration of selamectin was 100% effective in preventing the development of D. immitis in dogs and cats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940527     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00297-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  4 in total

1.  Preventive efficacy of oral moxidectin at various doses and dosage regimens against macrocyclic lactone-resistant heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) strains in dogs.

Authors:  Tom L McTier; Robert H Six; Aleah Pullins; Sara Chapin; Kristina Kryda; Sean P Mahabir; Debra J Woods; Steven J Maeder
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Efficacy of selamectin in the treatment of naturally acquired cheyletiellosis in cats.

Authors:  Nadège Chailleux; Manon Paradis
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Microfilarial reduction following ProHeart® 6 and ProHeart® SR-12 treatment in dogs experimentally inoculated with a resistant isolate of Dirofilaria immitis.

Authors:  Tom L McTier; Aleah Pullins; Gregory A Inskeep; Genevieve Gagnon; Huihao Fan; Adam Schoell; Tara Bidgood; Joyce Login; Patrick Meeus
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  A review of the off-label use of selamectin (Stronghold/Revolution) in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Maggie A Fisher; David J Shanks
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 1.695

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.