| Literature DB >> 10940392 |
D M Gillard1, S Yakovenko, T Cameron, A Prochazka.
Abstract
In this study we tested the hypothesis that during steady contractions of human wrist extensors or flexors, the torque-angle relationship during movements imposed about the wrist is predicted by the classical isometric muscle length-tension curve, with ascending, descending and ascending limbs. Angle-torque relationships were measured during steady muscle activation (10% of maximal voluntary contraction: MVC), elicited either by electrical stimulation or voluntary regulation of the electromyogram (EMG). Flexion-extension movements of constant speed (+/-10 degrees /s) were imposed on the subjects' hands with a servo actuator, either through the full physiological range of motion +/-50 degrees, or through +/-10 degrees. During extensor contractions, angle-torque curves in +/-50 degrees movements had ascending, descending and ascending limbs, as in isometric contractions. However, in +/-10 degrees movements, torque always increased with increasing muscle length and decreased with decreasing length, even over angles corresponding to the descending limb of isometric curves. For flexor activation, angle-torque curves had similar properties, though descending limbs were less obvious or absent. During imposed movements, hysteresis was observed in the angle-torque curves. This was attributed to non-linearities of the active muscles. Hysteresis reached a maximum at intermediate wrist angles and declined at maximal muscle length, contradicting the recent hypothesis that sarcomere non-uniformity is responsible for the hysteresis. We conclude that the classical isometric length-tension curve, with its prominent descending limb, does not predict angle-torque curves of human wrist muscles in continuous movements. A more appropriate model is one in which stiffness about the wrist is always positive and hysteresis is a significant factor.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10940392 DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00127-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech ISSN: 0021-9290 Impact factor: 2.712