A C Povey1, C N Hall, A F Badawi, D P Cooper, P J O'Connor. 1. Cancer Research Campaign Section of Genome Damage and Repair, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, M20 9BX, UK. apovey@fsi.scg.man.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pro-mutagenic lesion O(6)-methyldeoxyguanosine (O(6)-MedG), a marker of exposure to many N-nitroso compounds (NOC), can be detected in normal and tumour DNA isolated from colorectal tissue. The biological significance of this exposure is, as yet, unknown but in situ NOC formation is bacterially catalysed suggesting that NOC formation and potentially DNA alkylation will vary throughout the large bowel. AIMS: To determine if O(6)-MedG levels in colorectal DNA vary within the large bowel. PATIENTS: We studied 62 men and women undergoing surgery for colorectal tumours in the north west of England. METHODS: O(6)-MedG levels were measured in paired normal and tumour DNA samples. DNA was digested to nucleosides, fractionated by HPLC, and purified O(6)-MedG quantified by a radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: O(6)-MedG was detected in 27 out of a total of 62 (43%) normal DNA samples and in 30 of 58 (52%) tumour DNA samples: it was present at concentrations of <0. 01-0.94 and <0.01-0.151 micromol O(6)-MedG/mol deoxyguanosine for normal and tumour DNA, respectively. Levels of O(6)-MedG in normal, but not tumour, DNA from the proximal colon were lower than those found in DNA from either the sigmoid colon (p=0.03) or rectum (p=0. 05). When the analysis was restricted to samples that contained O(6)-MedG, similar results were obtained in that O(6)-MedG levels in normal DNA were lower in the proximal colon than in the sigmoid colon (p=0.04) or rectum (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: DNA alkylation varied within the large bowel possibly due to in situ NOC formation and was highest in areas of the colon and rectum where the highest incidence of large bowel tumours occurs, suggesting that DNA alkylation may play a role in the aetiology of colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: The pro-mutagenic lesion O(6)-methyldeoxyguanosine (O(6)-MedG), a marker of exposure to many N-nitroso compounds (NOC), can be detected in normal and tumour DNA isolated from colorectal tissue. The biological significance of this exposure is, as yet, unknown but in situ NOC formation is bacterially catalysed suggesting that NOC formation and potentially DNA alkylation will vary throughout the large bowel. AIMS: To determine if O(6)-MedG levels in colorectal DNA vary within the large bowel. PATIENTS: We studied 62 men and women undergoing surgery for colorectal tumours in the north west of England. METHODS:O(6)-MedG levels were measured in paired normal and tumour DNA samples. DNA was digested to nucleosides, fractionated by HPLC, and purified O(6)-MedG quantified by a radioimmunoassay. RESULTS:O(6)-MedG was detected in 27 out of a total of 62 (43%) normal DNA samples and in 30 of 58 (52%) tumour DNA samples: it was present at concentrations of <0. 01-0.94 and <0.01-0.151 micromol O(6)-MedG/mol deoxyguanosine for normal and tumour DNA, respectively. Levels of O(6)-MedG in normal, but not tumour, DNA from the proximal colon were lower than those found in DNA from either the sigmoid colon (p=0.03) or rectum (p=0. 05). When the analysis was restricted to samples that contained O(6)-MedG, similar results were obtained in that O(6)-MedG levels in normal DNA were lower in the proximal colon than in the sigmoid colon (p=0.04) or rectum (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: DNA alkylation varied within the large bowel possibly due to in situ NOC formation and was highest in areas of the colon and rectum where the highest incidence of large bowel tumours occurs, suggesting that DNA alkylation may play a role in the aetiology of colorectal cancer.
Authors: B Liu; N C Nicolaides; S Markowitz; J K Willson; R E Parsons; J Jen; N Papadopolous; P Peltomäki; A de la Chapelle; S R Hamilton Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: S A Bingham; B Pignatelli; J R Pollock; A Ellul; C Malaveille; G Gross; S Runswick; J H Cummings; I K O'Neill Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Arash Etemadi; Christian C Abnet; Barry I Graubard; Laura Beane-Freeman; Neal D Freedman; Linda Liao; Sanford M Dawsey; Rashmi Sinha Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Paige E Miller; Philip Lazarus; Samuel M Lesko; Amanda J Cross; Rashmi Sinha; Jason Laio; Jay Zhu; Gregory Harper; Joshua E Muscat; Terryl J Hartman Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Daniel Y Wang; Aaron P Thrift; Neda Zarrin-Khameh; Alexandra Wichmann; Georgina N Armstrong; Patricia A Thompson; Melissa L Bondy; Benjamin L Musher Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Fang Zhang; Masaru Tsunoda; Kaoru Suzuki; Yuji Kikuchi; Oliver Wilkinson; Christopher L Millington; Geoffrey P Margison; David M Williams; Ella Czarina Morishita; Akio Takénaka Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Pattama Senthong; Christopher L Millington; Oliver J Wilkinson; Andrew S Marriott; Amanda J Watson; Onrapak Reamtong; Claire E Eyers; David M Williams; Geoffrey P Margison; Andrew C Povey Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 16.971