Literature DB >> 10938905

Patients' perceptions of physicians communication and outcomes of the accrual to trial process.

C H Grant1, K N Cissna, L B Rosenfeld.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relations among patients' perceptions of their physicians' communicative behavior during the informed consent interview, the patient's feeling of being confirmed by the physician and satisfied with care delivered by the physician, and the patient's decision to participate in a clinical trial or not. Respondents included 130 cancer patients who were eligible for a clinical trial and who had recently discussed trial participation with their physicians. Results indicated that a linear combination of the variables physician affiliative style, physician dominant or controlling style, patient satisfaction, patient confirmation, patient preference for decision making, patient desire for information, and patient age discriminate between patients who agree to participate in clinical trials and patients who refuse to participate. Physicians' affiliative communicative behaviors and patient satisfaction were clearly important to patients who agreed to participate. Motivations for patients who declined to participate in trials were less clear. Implications for physicians who offer clinical trials to their patients are that specific communication skills may enhance their patients' satisfaction and may help increase enrollment in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10938905     DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1201_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  8 in total

1.  Physician-related factors involved in patient decisions to enroll onto cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert L Comis; Jon D Miller; Diane D Colaizzi; Linda G Kimmel
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Enhancing the Informed Consent Process Using Shared Decision Making and Consent Refusal Data from the CLEAR III Trial.

Authors:  Amanda L Porter; James Ebot; Karen Lane; Lesia H Mooney; Amy M Lannen; Eugene M Richie; Rachel Dlugash; Steve Mayo; Thomas G Brott; Wendy Ziai; William D Freeman; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Qualitative inquiry: a method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  Christina Slota; Connie M Ulrich; Claiborne Miller-Davis; Karen Baker; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Perception of clinical research among patients and healthy volunteers of clinical trials.

Authors:  Felix Bergmann; Peter Matzneller; Maria Weber; Lusine Yeghiazaryan; Thorsten Fuereder; Thomas Weber; Markus Zeitlinger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Saudis towards Participating in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mohamad A Al-Tannir; Nahid El-Bakri; Amani K Abu-Shaheen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  From "One Health" to "One Communication": The Contribution of Communication in Veterinary Medicine to Public Health.

Authors:  Micaela Cipolla; Luigi Bonizzi; Alfonso Zecconi
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  "When Offered to Participate": A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Agreement to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Dawn L Hershman; Cathee Till; Lori M Minasian; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Mark E Fleury; Riha Vaidya
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.