Literature DB >> 10937407

The urban and rural divide for women giving birth in NSW, 1990-1997.

C L Roberts1, C S Algert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the pregnancy profile and outcomes of urban and rural women.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the NSW Midwives Data Collection on births in NSW, 1990-1997. Associations between place of residence (urban/rural) and maternal factors and pregnancy outcomes were examined, including changes over time.
RESULTS: From 1990 to 1997 there were 685,631 confinements in NSW and these mothers resided as follows: 76% metropolitan, 5% large rural centres, 8% small rural centres, 11% other rural areas and 1% remote areas. Rural mothers were more likely to be teenagers, multiparous, without a married or de facto partner, public patients and smokers. Births in rural areas declined, particularly among women aged 20-34 years. Infants born to mothers in remote communities were at increased odds of stillbirth and low Apgar scores (all women) and small-for-gestational- age (SGA) (Indigenous women only).
CONCLUSIONS: The profile of pregnant women in rural NSW is different from their urban counterparts and is consistent with relative socioeconomic disadvantage and possibly suboptimal maternity services in some areas. While increased risk of SGA is associated with environmental factors such as smoking and nutrition, the reasons the increased risk of stillbirth are unclear. Although there does not appear to be an increase d risk of preterm birth for rural women this may be masked by transfer of high risk pregnancies interstate. IMPLICATIONS: Maternity services need to be available and accessible to all rural women with targeting of interventions known to reduce low birthweight and perinatal death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937407     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb01571.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  7 in total

1.  Does rural or urban residence make a difference to neonatal outcome in premature birth? A regional study in Australia.

Authors:  M E Abdel-Latif; B Bajuk; J Oei; T Vincent; L Sutton; K Lui
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Maternal morbidity and perinatal outcomes among women in rural versus urban areas.

Authors:  Sarka Lisonkova; Matthew D Haslam; Leanne Dahlgren; Innie Chen; Anne R Synnes; Kenneth I Lim
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A population-based investigation into inequalities amongst Indigenous mothers and newborns by place of residence in the Northern Territory, Australia.

Authors:  Malinda Steenkamp; Alice Rumbold; Lesley Barclay; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Community Remoteness, Perinatal Outcomes and Infant Mortality among First Nations in Quebec.

Authors:  Spogmai Wassimi; Nancy G L McHugh; Russell Wilkins; Maureen Heaman; Patricia Martens; Janet Smylie; Fabienne Simonet; William D Fraser; Zhong-Cheng Luo
Journal:  Open Womens Health J       Date:  2010-01-01

5.  The Influence of Individual and Contextual Socioeconomic Status on Obstetric Care Utilization in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Olatunde Aremu; Stephen Lawoko; Koustuv Dalal
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-04

6.  Environmental and socio-economic determinants of infant mortality in Poland: an ecological study.

Authors:  Agnieszka Genowska; Jacek Jamiołkowski; Krystyna Szafraniec; Urszula Stepaniak; Andrzej Szpak; Andrzej Pająk
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Associated Risk Factors: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yeneneh Ayalew Workineh; Hailemariam Mekonnen Workie
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2022-03-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.