Literature DB >> 10937332

Testing for robustness in Monte Carlo studies.

R C Serlin1.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo studies provide the information needed to help researchers select appropriate analytical procedures under design conditions in which the underlying assumptions of the procedures are not met. In Monte Carlo studies, the 2 errors that one could commit involve (a) concluding that a statistical procedure is robust when it is not or (b) concluding that it is not robust when it is. In previous attempts to apply standard statistical design principles to Monte Carlo studies, the less severe of these errors has been wrongly designated the Type I error. In this article, a method is presented for controlling the appropriate Type I error rate; the determination of the number of iterations required in a Monte Carlo study to achieve desired power is described; and a confidence interval for a test's true Type I error rate is derived. A robustness criterion is also proposed that is a compromise between W. G. Cochran's (1952) and J. V. Bradley's (1978) criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937332     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  2 in total

1.  Some Improvements in Confidence Intervals for Standardized Regression Coefficients.

Authors:  Paul Dudgeon
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Testing mediation in nursing research: beyond Baron and Kenny.

Authors:  Melanie R Krause; Ronald C Serlin; Sandra E Ward; Rachel Yaffa Zisk Rony; Miriam O Ezenwa; Florence Naab
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.