Literature DB >> 10937202

The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards.

M A Butler1, T W Schoener, J B Losos.   

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is the evolutionary result of selection operating differently on the body sizes of males and females. Anolis lizard species of the Greater Antilles have been classified into ecomorph classes, largely on the basis of their structural habitat (perch height and diameter). We show that the major ecomorph classes differ in degree of SSD. At least two SSD classes are supported: high SSD (trunk-crown, trunk-ground) and low SSD (trunk, crown-giant, grass-bush, twig). Differences cannot be attributed to an allometric increase of SSD with body size or to a phylogenetic effect. A third explanation, that selective pressures on male and/or female body size vary among habitat types, is examined by evaluating expectations from the major relevant kinds of selective pressures. Although no one kind of selective pressure produces expectations consistent with all of the information, competition with respect to structural habitat and sexual selection pressures are more likely possibilities than competition with respect to prey size or optimal feeding pressures. The existence of habitat-specific sexual dimorphism suggests that adaptation of Anolis species to their environment is more complex than previously appreciated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

1.  Why the phylogenetic regression appears robust to tree misspecification.

Authors:  Eric A Stone
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae): a role for ecological causation.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; Jill S Miller; Joanna L Rifkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The oestrogen pathway underlies the evolution of exaggerated male cranial shapes in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Thomas J Sanger; Susan M Seav; Masayoshi Tokita; R Brian Langerhans; Lela M Ross; Jonathan B Losos; Arhat Abzhanov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Run for your life, but bite for your rights? How interactions between natural and sexual selection shape functional morphology across habitats.

Authors:  Verónica Gomes; Miguel A Carretero; Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-01-02

5.  Sexual dimorphism in primate aerobic capacity: a phylogenetic test.

Authors:  Patrik Lindenfors; L J Revell; C L Nunn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards.

Authors:  Devi M Stuart-Fox; Terry J Ord
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Phylogenetic ANOVA: The Expression Variance and Evolution Model for Quantitative Trait Evolution.

Authors:  Rori V Rohlfs; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Motion-based signaling in sympatric species of Australian agamid lizards.

Authors:  Jose A Ramos; Richard A Peters
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch's rule.

Authors:  Wen Bo Liao; Yu Zeng; Cai Quan Zhou; Robert Jehle
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Patterns of sexual dimorphism in Mexican alligator lizards, Barisia imbricata.

Authors:  Daniel Dashevsky; Jesse M Meik; Estrella Mociño-Deloya; Kirk Setser; Sarah Schaack
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.