Literature DB >> 10937180

Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies.

E Rolán-Alvarez1, A Caballero.   

Abstract

Sexual selection (defined as the change in genotypic or phenotypic frequencies of mated versus total population frequencies) and sexual isolation (defined as the deviation from random mating in mated individuals) show different evolutionary consequences and partially confounded causes. Traditionally, the cross-product estimator has been used to quantify sexual selection, whereas a variety of indexes, such as Yule V, Yule Q, YA, joint I, and others have been used to quantify sexual isolation. Because the two types of estimators use different scales, the effects of both processes cannot be monitored simultaneously. We describe three new related statistics that quantify both sexual selection (PSS) and sexual isolation (PSI) effects for every mating pair combination in polymorphic traits, as well as measure their combined effects (PTI = PSI x PSS). The new statistics have the advantage of providing information on every mating pair combination, quantifying the effects of sexual selection and isolation in the same units, and detecting asymmetry in sexual isolation. The ability of the new statistics to ascertain the biological causes of sexual selection and sexual isolation are investigated under different models involving distinct marginal frequencies, mate propensity, and mate choice coefficients. We also studied the use of classical isolation indexes applied on PSI coefficients, instead of on raw data. The use of the classical indexes applied to PSI coefficients considerably reduces the statistical bias of the estimates, revealing the good estimation properties of the new statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937180     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00004.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  25 in total

1.  Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement.

Authors:  P Nosil; B J Crespi; C P Sandoval
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Body size evolution simultaneously creates and collapses species boundaries in a clade of scincid lizards.

Authors:  Jonathan Q Richmond; Elizabeth L Jockusch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Megan L Head; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Divergent host-plant use promotes reproductive isolation among cynipid gall wasp populations.

Authors:  Scott P Egan; Glen R Hood; Jeff L Feder; James R Ott
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Effect of chromosome arrangements on mate recognition system leading to behavioral isolation in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Hybridization, Behavioral Patterns, and Pre- and Postzygotic Isolation Between Two Recently Derived Species of Walnut-Infesting Rhagoletis Fruit Flies in the Highlands of Mexico.

Authors:  Eduardo Tadeo; Juan Rull
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.434

7.  Male pheromone polymorphism and reproductive isolation in populations of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Gwénaëlle Bontonou; Béatrice Denis; Claude Wicker-Thomas
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.

Authors:  Jackson H Jennings; Dominique Mazzi; Michael G Ritchie; Anneli Hoikkala
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains shell banding polymorphisms in two marine snails (Littorina fabalis and Littorina saxatilis).

Authors:  Daniel Estévez; Juan Galindo; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Intraspecific variability in the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma chilonis: can we predict the outcome of hybridization?

Authors:  Chiara Benvenuto; Elisabeth Tabone; Elodie Vercken; Nathalie Sorbier; Etty Colombel; Sylvie Warot; Xavier Fauvergue; Nicolas Ris
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.