Literature DB >> 10937101

Mersilene mesh chin augmentation. A 14-year experience.

E J Gross1, M M Hamilton, K Ackermann, S W Perkins.   

Abstract

During the past 20 years, a variety of alloplastic materials have been introduced for chin augmentation. Mersilene mesh (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ), introduced in 1950, demonstrates many qualities that make it an ideal implant. This article reviews the senior author's (S.W.P.) successful 14-year experience using Mersilene mesh chin implants. Between 1983 and 1997, 264 patients underwent chin implantation procedures. The results show a low rate of infection (0.8%) and displacement (1.5%). There were 14 temporary paresthesias and no cases of permanent anesthesia. There were no incidences of absorption, rejection, or extrusion. Mersilene provides a soft, natural appearance to the chin, and it continues to be our choice for chin implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10937101     DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.1.3.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  3 in total

1.  Prolene mesh mentoplasty.

Authors:  A Emre Ilhan; Gurkan Kayabasoglu; K Cagdas Kazikdas; Abdulkadir Goksel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Osseous genioplasty: A case series.

Authors:  Sanjeev N Deshpande; Amarnath V Munoli
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09

3.  Delayed Mental Nerve Neuralgia following Chin Augmentation.

Authors:  Ineke Wever; Sang Hwang; Sim Choroomi; William Mooney
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.