Literature DB >> 10937052

Immunohistochemical p16INK4a analysis of archival tumors with deletion, hypermethylation, or mutation of the CDKN2/MTS1 gene. A comparison of four commercial antibodies.

J Geradts1, R H Hruban, M Schutte, S E Kern, R Maynard.   

Abstract

The MTS1/CDKN2/p16 gene encoding the p16INK4a tumor-suppressor protein is commonly inactivated by homozygous deletion or hypermethylation of the promoter in a wide range of human malignancies. In select tumor types, including pancreatic adenocarcinomas, intragenic mutations are found in a significant percentage of cases. The immunoreactivity of mutant p16 proteins has not been comprehensively studied. Moreover, the immunohistochemical properties of commercially available antibodies have not been described in detail. We studied 35 pancreatic adenocarcinomas with a molecularly defined p16 status (16 homozygous deletions, 3 hypermethylated cases, and 16 tumors with an intragenic mutation in one allele associated with loss of the second allele). In addition, we studied nine cell lines (three homozygous deletions, three hypermethylated lines, and three intragenic mutations). Paraffin sections of the tumors and cell blocks were reacted with four different anti-p16 antibodies: polyclonal and monoclonal (clone G175-405) antibodies from PharMingen, monoclonal antibody DCS-50 from Oncogene Science, and monoclonal antibody ZJ11 from Neo-Markers. Optimal staining conditions were established for each antibody. The pancreatic carcinomas with homozygous p16 deletions were largely devoid of nuclear staining (admixed nonneoplastic cells served as internal positive controls); only one adenocarcinoma each reacted with DCS-50 and the polyclonal antibody, and five were positive with ZJ11, suggesting that nonspecific nuclear staining can occur under certain conditions. Antibody DCS-50 produced nuclear staining in all three hypermethylated carcinomas, whereas G175-405 stained none of them. Three of the four antibodies produced nuclear immunoreactivity in 7 to 14 of the 16 carcinomas carrying p16 mutations; G175-405 showed only weak reactivity in one case. Cytoplasmic staining was present in all carcinomas and cell lines and with all antibodies and therefore cannot be considered specific; it was strongest with G175-405. Thus, we found antibody G175-405 to be the most specific, and monoclonals DCS-50 and ZJ11 the least specific for wild-type p16. However, the former tends to give stronger cytoplasmic background staining. For tumor types in which p16 mutations are uncommon, the PharMingen polyclonal antibody may be a suitable alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937052     DOI: 10.1097/00129039-200003000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  11 in total

1.  Expression, deletion [was deleton] and mutation of p16 gene in human gastric cancer.

Authors:  X S He; Q Su; Z C Chen; X T He; Z F Long; H Ling; L R Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Expression of p16 gene and Rb protein in gastric carcinoma and their clinicopathological significance.

Authors:  Xiu-Sheng He; Ying-Hui Rong; Qi Su; Qiao Luo; Dong-Mei He; Yan-Lan Li; Yan Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  p16INK4a is a prognostic marker in resected ductal pancreatic cancer: an analysis of p16INK4a, p53, MDM2, an Rb.

Authors:  Berthold Gerdes; Annette Ramaswamy; Andreas Ziegler; Sven A Lang; Michael Kersting; Renate Baumann; Anja Wild; Roland Moll; Matthias Rothmund; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Induction of the tumor-suppressor p16(INK4a) within regenerative epithelial crypts in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Emma E Furth; Karen S Gustafson; Charlotte Y Dai; Steven L Gibson; Paul Menard-Katcher; Tina Chen; Jim Koh; Greg H Enders
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Clinical significance of the genetic landscape of pancreatic cancer and implications for identification of potential long-term survivors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Catherine M White; Yoshiki Naito; Yi Zhong; Jacqueline A Brosnan; Anne M Macgregor-Das; Richard A Morgan; Tyler Saunders; Daniel A Laheru; Joseph M Herman; Ralph H Hruban; Alison P Klein; Siân Jones; Victor Velculescu; Christopher L Wolfgang; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  p16INK4A as a marker for cervical dyskaryosis: CIN and cGIN in cervical biopsies and ThinPrep smears.

Authors:  N Murphy; M Ring; A G Killalea; V Uhlmann; M O'Donovan; F Mulcahy; M Turner; E McGuinness; M Griffin; C Martin; O Sheils; J J O'Leary
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  From somatic mutation to early detection: insights from molecular characterization of pancreatic cancer precursor lesions.

Authors:  Catherine G Fischer; Laura D Wood
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  The role of tobacco-derived carcinogens in pancreas cancer.

Authors:  Rajiv Lochan; Helen L Reeves; Anne K Daly; Richard M Charnley
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-07-17

9.  Methylation and Immunoexpression of p16(INK4a) Tumor Suppressor Gene in Primary Breast Cancer Tissue and Their Quantitative p16(INK4a) Hypermethylation in Plasma by Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Jae Jun Lee; Eunkyung Ko; Junhun Cho; Ha Young Park; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Duk-Hwan Kim; Eun Yoon Cho
Journal:  Korean J Pathol       Date:  2012-12-26

10.  Pancreatic tumours: molecular pathways implicated in ductal cancer are involved in ampullary but not in exocrine nonductal or endocrine tumorigenesis.

Authors:  P S Moore; S Orlandini; G Zamboni; P Capelli; G Rigaud; M Falconi; C Bassi; N R Lemoine; A Scarpa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.