Cardiovascular responses to epinephrine-containing local anesthetics for dental use: a comparison of hemodynamic responses to infiltration anesthesia and ergometer-stress testing.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular effects of infiltration anesthesia have been documented in numerous studies. However, few studies have been carried out to compare the effects of infiltration anesthesia with the effects of exercise-stress testing. The purpose of this study was to examine this issue. STUDY
DESIGN: Eight young and 13 older subjects were given infusions of epinephrine to produce cardiovascular responses comparable with those found in subjects undergoing infiltration anesthesia with 3.6 mL of lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine (L-E). Cardiovascular responses to this drug treatment were evaluated with echocardiography and compared with those produced by ergometer exercise.
RESULTS: The hemodynamic effects of L-E infiltration anesthesia were less than those produced by ergometer-stress testing at 25 watts (W) in young subjects and at 15 W in the older subjects. The workload of this ergometer-stress testing was about 4 metabolic equivalents (METS), which is approximately equivalent to the workload of walking 4.8 km/hr, doing light yard work (ie, raking leaves, weeding, or pushing a power mower), painting, or doing light carpentry.
CONCLUSION: With the exception of some specific pathologic conditions, such as serious arrhythmia, infiltration anesthesia with 3.6 mL of L-E can be carried out safely on the patients who have exercise capacity of more than 4 METS.