Literature DB >> 10936785

Improving diagnostic accuracy of prostate carcinoma by systematic random map-biopsy.

J Szabó1, G Hegedûs, K Bartók, T Kerényi, A Végh, I Romics, B Szende.   

Abstract

Systematic random rectal ultrasound directed map-biopsy of the prostate was performed in 77 RDE (rectal digital examination) positive and 25 RDE negative cases, if applicable. Hypoechoic areas were found in 30% of RDE positive and in 16% of RDE negative cases. The score for carcinoma in the hypoechoic areas was 6.5% in RDE positive and 0% in RDE negative cases, whereas systematic map biopsy detected 62% carcinomas in RDE positive, and 16% carcinomas in RDE negative patients. The probability of positive diagnosis of prostate carcinoma increased in parallel with the number of biopsy samples/case. The importance of systematic map biopsy is emphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10936785     DOI: 10.1007/bf03032359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  17 in total

1.  Systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy after negative digitally directed prostate biopsy.

Authors:  H R Lippman; A A Ghiatas; M F Sarosdy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Transrectal ultrasound guided versus digitally directed prostatic biopsy: a comparative study.

Authors:  M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  F Lee; S Torp-Pedersen; P J Littrup; R D McLeary; T A McHugh; A P Smid; P J Stella; G S Borlaza
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The significance of the prostatic hypoechoic area: results in 226 ultrasonically guided prostatic biopsies.

Authors:  M Devonec; J P Fendler; M Monsallier; P Mouriquand; J H Maquet; J L Mestas; N Dutrieux-Berger; P Perrin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Ultrasonically guided precise needle placement in the prostate and the seminal vesicles.

Authors:  H H Holm; J Gammelgaard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Systematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examination.

Authors:  G Vallancien; D Prapotnich; B Veillon; J M Brisset; J Andre-Bougaran
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The ability of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer in men with the clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  D E Coplen; G L Andriole; J J Yuan; W J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Systematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients referred for prostate evaluation.

Authors:  P Hammerer; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Evaluation of percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen to improve specificity of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; R L Wolfert; T J Wang; H G Rittenhouse; T L Ratliff; R B Nadler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Is quadrant biopsy sufficient in men likely to have advanced prostate cancer? Comparison with extended biopsy.

Authors:  Zoran Brnic; Slavko Gasparov; Petar Vladislav Lozo; Petar Anic; Leonardo Patrlj; Vesna Ramljak
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  How to improve prostate biopsy detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D K Ornstein; J Kang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.