Literature DB >> 1093603

A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectum.

T T Irvin, J C Goligher.   

Abstract

Three methods of perineal wound closure were studied in a randomized prospective clinical trial in 106 patients undergoing excision of the rectum for inflammatory or malignant disease. In method 2 the perineal wound was managed by open drainage. In both methods 2 and 3 the perineal wound was closed by primary suture, suprapubic suction drains being left down to the presacral space, but in method 2 the pelvic peritoneal floor was reconstituted, whilst in method 3 it was left unsutured. Topical and systemic antibiotics were administered to all patients submitted to primary closure of the perineal wound but not routinely to those whose perineal wound was left open. The overall operative mortality was 8-5 per cent but no deaths could be definitely attributed to perineal wound complications. The incidence of primary wound healing after methods 2 and 3 was 45-2 and 42-9 per cent respectively. Operative contamination of the perineal wound had an adverse effect on perineal wound healing. The incidence of persistent wound sinuses and unhealed wounds at 3 and 6 months after primary wound closure was rather less than that encountered after open drainage. It was concluded that primary closure of the perineal wound is the treatment of choice following excision of the rectum, except in cases in which contamination of the perineal wound has occurred during operation or the final state of haemostasis in the pelvis with diathermy and suture at the conclusion of the dissection was deemed to be unsatisfactory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1093603     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800620409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  K L Leung; S P Kwok; W Y Lau; W C Meng; C C Chung; P B Lai; K H Kwong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Complications of perineal surgery.

Authors:  James W Ogilvie; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

3.  Management of nonhealing perineal wounds.

Authors:  Jill C Genua; David A Vivas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-11

4.  Management of the chronic perineal sinus: not a problem to sit on.

Authors:  V Lees; W G Everett
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nasir Zaheer Ahmad; Muhammad Hasan Abbas; Noof Mohammed A B Al-Naimi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Management of the Perineal Defect after Abdominoperineal Excision.

Authors:  Colin Peirce; Sean Martin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

7.  Persistent perineal sinus after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Amélie Chau; Mathieu Prodeau; Hélène Sarter; Corinne Gower; Moshe Rogosnitzky; Yves Panis; Philippe Zerbib
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Skin cover of perineal defects using V-Y flaps.

Authors:  M C Marti; B Roche; R G Gumener
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Conservative proctocolectomy with low transection of the anorectum is a poor alternative to conventional proctocolectomy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  M C Winslet; J Alexander-Williams; M R Keighley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Persistent perineal sinus: incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, and management.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.