Literature DB >> 10935952

Patients' own reasons and patient-perceived recommendations for orthognathic surgery.

S M Rivera1, J P Hatch, C Dolce, R A Bays, J E Van Sickels, J D Rugh.   

Abstract

In an attempt to learn more about patients' decision-making processes, an analysis was performed to examine patients' reasons for undergoing orthognathic surgery and their understanding of the reasons surgery was recommended. Before surgery, 105 females and 38 males completed an open-ended questionnaire in which they listed their reasons for choosing orthognathic surgery and their perceptions of their orthodontists' recommendations. Three raters classified the responses into 7 categories: esthetics, psychosocial, functional, TMJ/pain, authority, prevention, and other. Rater agreement ranged from a kappa of.55 to 1.00. Patients reported undergoing orthognathic surgery primarily for esthetic, functional, and TMJ improvements, 71%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Females reported more TMJ-related reasons than males (P <.05). Patients reporting function (P <. 05), TMJ (P <.05), and prevention of future problems (P <.05) were older than patients not reporting these reasons. Mexican American patients indicated more psychosocial reasons (P <.05) than European Americans. Patients understood that orthognathic surgery was recommended primarily for esthetic, functional, and TMJ improvements, 52%, 44%, and 18%, respectively. Males reported receiving more preventative recommendations (23%) than females (10%). Mexican American patients reported receiving more psychosocial recommendations (P <.05) than European Americans. Agreement between each paired patient/patient-perceived reason was highest for TMJ problems (kappa = 0.588). In conclusion, patients underwent orthognathic surgery to improve esthetic, functional and TMJ problems and interpreted orthodontists' recommendations for similar reasons. On a case-to-case basis, agreement between patient and orthodontist-represented reasons was modest, suggesting differences between patients' own reasons and their perceptions of orthodontists' recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10935952     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Do orthopedic corrections of growing retrognathic hyperdivergent patients produce stable results?

Authors:  Alec J Rice; Roberto Carrillo; Phillip M Campbell; Reginald W Taylor; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparison of two survey instruments measuring quality of life in pediatric dentofacial patients.

Authors:  Alan Carlotto; Shiva Shanker; F Michael Beck; Allen Firestone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Facial deformity correction and genioplasty; a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Omed Shafiq Hama Amin; Saman Wahid Abdulrahman; Ahmad Altom; Bikhtiyar Azad Hasan; Rebwar Hassan Khdhir; Rostam Hama Zorab; Jeza M Abdul Aziz; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-25

4.  Prevalence and treatment of dentofacial deformities on a multiethnic population: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Fábio Ricardo Loureiro Sato; Francesco Salvatore Mannarino; Luciana Asprino; Márcio de Moraes
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-14

Review 5.  Oral health-related quality of life in patients with dentofacial deformity: a new concept in decision-making treatment?

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Maria Gabriela Haye Biazevic; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-28

6.  Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

7.  A machine learning framework for automated diagnosis and computer-assisted planning in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Paul G M Knoops; Athanasios Papaioannou; Alessandro Borghi; Richard W F Breakey; Alexander T Wilson; Owase Jeelani; Stefanos Zafeiriou; Derek Steinbacher; Bonnie L Padwa; David J Dunaway; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Nonsurgical Orthodontic Intervention of a Severe Class II Case Accompanied by Posterior Crossbite Using a Miniscrew-Assisted Straight Wire Technique.

Authors:  Abdulkarim A Hatrom; Ahmed R Afify; Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2019-10-03

9.  Self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness among patients requiring orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Orlagh Hunt; Donald Burden; Mike Stevenson; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Impact of orthognathic surgery on quality of life in patients with different dentofacial deformities: longitudinal study of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) with at least 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Jacco G Tuk; Jerome A Lindeboom; Misha L Tan; J de Lange
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.