OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of the Glenn procedure in terms of establishing the Fontan procedure. METHODS: Surgical results were investigated in 248 patients undergoing either the total or partial right heart bypass. Of these, the conventional and the bidirectional Glenn procedures were employed in 27 and 58 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Conversion to the Fontan circulation was attempted in 32 of 58 patients initially considered unsuitable for the Fontan circulation and undergoing the bidirectional Glenn procedure, with 2 operative deaths. Of the 27 undergoing the conventional Glenn procedure, 13 have undergone conversion with 2 deaths. Actuarial survival rate after the staged Fontan approach did not statistically differ from that after the primary Fontan procedure. Catheterization in 130 patients with the established Fontan circulation showed no significant differences in ejection fraction, end diastolic volume, and end diastolic pressure of the systemic ventricle, as well as in Cardiac Index, between the group of patients treated with the primary Fontan procedure and the group treated with the staged Fontan procedure. When achieving the bidirectional Glenn procedure, the size of the additional channel from the ventricles to the pulmonary arteries was correlated with the postoperative change in pulmonary arterial size, but such additional forward flow produced insufficient ventricular offloading in 9 of 16 patients with significant atrioventricular valvar regurgitation. CONCLUSION: The staged Fontan strategy has an advantage in patients with complicated circumstances. Whether the primary or the staged Fontan procedure was used, however, did not affect the Fontan circulation itself when once the Fontan circulation was established. The additional forward flow in the bidirectional Glenn physiology, if employed, should be appropriately adjusted, considering both the advantages and the disadvantages of the option.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of the Glenn procedure in terms of establishing the Fontan procedure. METHODS: Surgical results were investigated in 248 patients undergoing either the total or partial right heart bypass. Of these, the conventional and the bidirectional Glenn procedures were employed in 27 and 58 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Conversion to the Fontan circulation was attempted in 32 of 58 patients initially considered unsuitable for the Fontan circulation and undergoing the bidirectional Glenn procedure, with 2 operative deaths. Of the 27 undergoing the conventional Glenn procedure, 13 have undergone conversion with 2 deaths. Actuarial survival rate after the staged Fontan approach did not statistically differ from that after the primary Fontan procedure. Catheterization in 130 patients with the established Fontan circulation showed no significant differences in ejection fraction, end diastolic volume, and end diastolic pressure of the systemic ventricle, as well as in Cardiac Index, between the group of patients treated with the primary Fontan procedure and the group treated with the staged Fontan procedure. When achieving the bidirectional Glenn procedure, the size of the additional channel from the ventricles to the pulmonary arteries was correlated with the postoperative change in pulmonary arterial size, but such additional forward flow produced insufficient ventricular offloading in 9 of 16 patients with significant atrioventricular valvar regurgitation. CONCLUSION: The staged Fontan strategy has an advantage in patients with complicated circumstances. Whether the primary or the staged Fontan procedure was used, however, did not affect the Fontan circulation itself when once the Fontan circulation was established. The additional forward flow in the bidirectional Glenn physiology, if employed, should be appropriately adjusted, considering both the advantages and the disadvantages of the option.
Authors: H Uemura; T Yagihara; Y Kawashima; F Yamamoto; K Nishigaki; O Matsuki; K Okada; T Kamiya; R H Anderson Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: A M Mendelsohn; E L Bove; F M Lupinetti; D C Crowley; T R Lloyd; R H Beekman Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: J Kobayashi; H Matsuda; S Nakano; Y Shimazaki; S Ikawa; M Mitsuno; Y Takahashi; Y Kawashima; J Arisawa; T Matsushita Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D A Bartmus; D J Driscoll; K P Offord; R A Humes; D D Mair; H V Schaff; F J Puga; G K Danielson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H Ichikawa; T Yagihara; H Kishimoto; F Isobe; F Yamamoto; K Nishigaki; O Matsuki; T Fujita Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 4.330