Literature DB >> 10934665

The future of clinical trials in chronic renal disease: outcome of an NIH/FDA/Physician Specialist Conference. Evaluation of Clinical Trial Endpoints in Chronic Renal Disease Study Group.

G L Bakris1, P Whelton, M Weir, A Mimran, W Keane, E Schiffrin.   

Abstract

For people with chronic renal insufficiency, the therapeutic goal is to prevent progression to end-stage renal disease, a serious condition that can only be treated with dialysis and kidney transplantation. Although restriction of dietary protein slows the progression of renal disease somewhat, the principal treatment to slow chronic renal disease is appropriate reduction of blood pressure. Antihypertensive agents, particularly those that produce sustained, long-term reductions in proteinuria, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, not only decrease blood pressure but also preserve renal function. Clinical trials to evaluate these and other drug therapies in renal disease progression have used both "hard end points" (e.g., dialysis, transplantation, death) and intermediate end points of renal disease progression (e.g., doubling of serum creatinine concentration, reductions in proteinuria). Trials that have used hard end points typically recruited patients with advanced renal disease to demonstrate a difference in therapies within a period of 2 to 5 years. However, proteinuria reduction, along with a decrease in the time to doubling of serum creatinine in very early diabetic renal disease, could demonstrate an altered natural history of renal disease. Although hard end points are indicators of a drug's efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events or preserving renal function, they do not assess the impact of a treatment on altering the natural history of early renal disease. For clinical trials of people with all but the most advanced renal disease, use of intermediate end points of renal disease progression is the only practical option for assessment of treatment efficacy and effectiveness. Given the available data on proteinuria reduction and doubling of serum creatinine from clinical trials, these end points, taken together, appear to provide an acceptable means of assessing a treatment's impact on slowing renal disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10934665     DOI: 10.1177/00912700022009549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  5 in total

1.  Randomized Controlled Trials 1: Design.

Authors:  Bryan M Curtis; Brendan J Barrett; Patrick S Parfrey
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Change in novel filtration markers and risk of ESRD.

Authors:  Casey M Rebholz; Morgan E Grams; Kunihiro Matsushita; Elizabeth Selvin; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Prognostic Value of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Mireille El Ters; Pengcheng Lu; Jonathan D Mahnken; Jason R Stubbs; Shiqin Zhang; Darren P Wallace; Jared J Grantham; Arlene B Chapman; Vicente E Torres; Peter C Harris; Kyongtae Ty Bae; Douglas P Landsittel; Frederic F Rahbari-Oskoui; Michal Mrug; William M Bennett; Alan S L Yu
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-01-16

4.  The Lipid lowering and Onset of Renal Disease (LORD) Trial: a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial assessing the effect of atorvastatin on the progression of kidney disease.

Authors:  Robert G Fassett; Madeleine J Ball; Iain K Robertson; Dominic P Geraghty; Jeff S Coombes
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 5.  Therapies for hyperglycaemia-induced diabetic complications: from animal models to clinical trials.

Authors:  Nigel A Calcutt; Mark E Cooper; Tim S Kern; Ann Marie Schmidt
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 84.694

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.