Literature DB >> 10934525

Basic problems of serological laboratory diagnosis.

W Fierz1.   

Abstract

Serological laboratory diagnosis is inflicted with at least two kinds of basic problems. One type relates to the fact that the serological diagnosis of infectious diseases is double indirect: First, to diagnose an infectious disease, the identification of the microbial agent is sought that caused the disease. Second, to identify this infectious agent, the patient's immune response to potential agents is measured. So, the serological test is neither measuring directly disease nor the cause of the disease, but the patient's immune system. Another type of problem is based on the fact that each person's immune system is very individual. The exact physicochemical properties of antibodies are unique for each clone of antibodies. The way an individual's immune system sees an infectious agent depends not only on the genetic makeup of the person but also on the personal experience from former encounters with infectious agents. Both types of problems lead to complexities in selecting the appropriate test, in interpreting the results, and in standardizing serological tests. Therefore, a close collaboration of the laboratory with the clinic is mandatory to avoid erroneous conclusions from serological test results, which might lead to wrong decisions in patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10934525     DOI: 10.1385/MB:13:2:89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1073-6085            Impact factor:   2.695


  29 in total

1.  Multicenter evaluation of five commercial rubella virus immunoglobulin G kits which report in international units per milliliter.

Authors:  W Dimech; A Bettoli; D Eckert; B Francis; J Hamblin; T Kerr; C Ryan; I Skurrie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Internal quality assurance in a clinical virology laboratory. II. Internal quality control.

Authors:  J J Gray; T G Wreghitt; T A McKee; P McIntyre; C E Roth; D J Smith; G Sutehall; G Higgins; R Geraghty; R Whetstone
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Chance-corrected measures of the validity of a binary diagnostic test.

Authors:  H Brenner; O Gefeller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Structural features of the reactions between antibodies and protein antigens.

Authors:  B C Braden; R J Poljak
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Early high-affinity neutralizing anti-viral IgG responses without further overall improvements of affinity.

Authors:  H P Roost; M F Bachmann; A Haag; U Kalinke; V Pliska; H Hengartner; R M Zinkernagel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Epitope type-specific IgG responses to capsid proteins VP1 and VP2 of human parvovirus B19.

Authors:  M Söderlund; C S Brown; W J Spaan; L Hedman; K Hedman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Seroprotective groups of Lyme borreliosis spirochetes from North America and Europe.

Authors:  S D Lovrich; S M Callister; L C Lim; B K DuChateau; R F Schell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Agalactosyl glycoforms of IgG autoantibodies are pathogenic.

Authors:  T W Rademacher; P Williams; R A Dwek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Isotype switching from IgG3 to IgG1 converts a nonprotective murine antibody to Cryptococcus neoformans into a protective antibody.

Authors:  R Yuan; A Casadevall; G Spira; M D Scharff
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  ROC curve regression analysis: the use of ordinal regression models for diagnostic test assessment.

Authors:  A N Tosteson; M C Weinstein; J Wittenberg; C B Begg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Integrating forecast probabilities in antibiograms: a way to guide antimicrobial prescriptions more reliably?

Authors:  Florian P Maurer; Patrice Courvalin; Erik C Böttger; Michael Hombach
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Investigating SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility in Animal Species: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Connor Rutherford; Pratap Kafle; Catherine Soos; Tasha Epp; Lori Bradford; Emily Jenkins
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.