| Literature DB >> 10934227 |
H Babbe1, A Roers, A Waisman, H Lassmann, N Goebels, R Hohlfeld, M Friese, R Schröder, M Deckert, S Schmidt, R Ravid, K Rajewsky.
Abstract
Clonal composition and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells infiltrating actively demyelinating multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions were determined with unprecedented resolution at the level of single cells. Individual CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells were isolated from frozen sections of lesional tissue by micromanipulation and subjected to single target amplification of TCR-beta gene rearrangements. This strategy allows the assignment of a TCR variable region (V region) sequence to the particular T cell from which it was amplified. Sequence analysis revealed that in both cases investigated, the majority of CD8(+) T cells belonged to few clones. One of these clones accounted for 35% of CD8(+) T cells in case 1. V region sequence comparison revealed signs of selection for common peptide specificities for some of the CD8(+) T cells in case 1. In both cases, the CD4(+) T cell population was more heterogeneous. Most CD4(+) and CD8(+) clones were represented in perivascular infiltrates as well as among parenchymal T cells. In case 2, two of the CD8(+) clones identified in brain tissue were also detected in peripheral blood. Investigation of the antigenic specificities of expanded clones may help to elucidate their functional properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10934227 PMCID: PMC2193223 DOI: 10.1084/jem.192.3.393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Med ISSN: 0022-1007 Impact factor: 14.307
Figure 1Schematic overview of sections of the two blocks of brain tissue (A and B) analyzed for case 1. Nos. 1–4 designate MS lesions from which T cells were micromanipulated. Hatched lesional areas show signs of ongoing myelin destruction. Block A also contained an old lesion (SCAR) showing astroglial scarring, and only a little infiltration by T cells or other signs of inflammation.
Representation of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Clones in Perivascular and Parenchymal Locations of the Four Lesions Analyzed for Case 1
| Single parenchymal CD8+ T cells | Single parenchymal CD4+ T cells | Samples of perivascular cells | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion | Clone no. | Frequency | Clone no. | Frequency | Clone no. | Frequency |
| No. 1 | 1 | 14/29 (48%) | 1 | 8/41 (20%) | ||
| 9 | 3/29 | 6 | 2/41 | |||
| 3, 4, 7, 15, 21 | 1/29 | 12 | 1/3 | 3, 4, 13,17 | 1/41 | |
| Sum: | 22/29 (76%) | Sum: | 14/41 (34%) | |||
| No. 2 | 1 | 6/28 (21%) | ||||
| 2 | 3/28 | 1, 8 | 3/25 | |||
| 9 | 2/28 | 2 | 2/25 | |||
| 3, 16, 18, 19 | 1/28 | 11 | 1/2 | 7, 10 16, 21 | 1/25 | |
| Sum: | 15/28 (54%) | Sum: | 12/25 (48%) | |||
| No. 3 | 1 | 8/24 (33%) | 1 | 4/14 | ||
| 16, 18 | 2/24 | 10, 11 | 2/19 | 4 | 2/14 | |
| 4, 14, 15, 17 | 1/24 | 12, 13 | 1/19 | 9, 14 | 1/14 | |
| Sum: | 16/24 (67%) | Sum: | 6/19 (32%) | Sum: | 8/14 | |
| No. 4 | 1 | 3/6 | ||||
| 10 | 1/13 | 9, 15 | 1/6 | |||
| Sum: | 5/6 | |||||
| Sum | 1 | 28/81 (35%) | ||||
| 9 | 5/81 | 1 | 18/86 (21%) | |||
| 2, 16, 18 | 3/81 | 10, 11 | 3/37 | 4, 8 | 3/86 | |
| 3, 4, 15 | 2/81 | 12 | 2/37 | 2, 6, 9 | 2/86 | |
| 7, 14, 17, 19, 21 | 1/81 | 13 | 1/37 | 3, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21 | 1/86 | |
| Sum: | 53/81 (65%) | Sum: | 9/37 (24%) | Sum: | 39/86 (45%) | |
Clonal expansions were identified by amplification of an identical rearrangement from at least two different samples of cells micromanipulated from material of case 1, and were numbered arbitrarily. Except for clones 6 and 8, all clones could be assigned to the CD8+ or CD4+ subset, as the clonal V region sequence was obtained at least once from a single parenchymal CD8+ or CD4+ cell. Only potentially functional rearrangements are listed. Three clones defined by nonfunctional rearrangments accounted for 7 of the 24 nonfunctional rearrangments obtained in total. These clonal sequences could not be assigned to clones defined by potentially functional rearrangements. The population of parenchymal T cells was dominated by CD8+ T cells (CD8/CD4 ≈ 3, as determined in lesions 3 and 4). Likewise, perivascular CD8+ T cells outnumbered perivascular CD4+ T cells roughly by a factor of three.
Representation of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Clones in Perivascular and Parenchymal Locations of the Single Lesion Analyzed for Case 2
| Single parenchymal CD8+ T cells | Single parenchymal CD4+ T cells | Samples of perivascular cells | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clone no. | Frequency | Clone no. | Frequency | Clone no. | Frequency |
| 2 | 4/24 (17%) | ||||
| 5 | 3/24 | 8 | 3/46 (7%) | ||
| 3, 6, 9 | 2/24 | 1, 2, 7 | 2/46 | ||
| 4, 8, 7, 10 | 1/24 | 13, 14, 15 | 2/52 | 3, 4, 10 | 1/46 |
| Sum: | 17/24 (71%) | Sum: | 6/52 (12%) | Sum: | 12/46 (26%) |
Clonal expansions were identified by amplification of an identical rearrangement from at least two different samples of cells micromanipulated from material of case 2, and were numbered arbitrarily. Except for clone 1, all clones could be assigned to the CD8+ or CD4+ subset, as the clonal V region sequence was obtained at least once from a single parenchymal CD8+ or CD4+ cell. Only potentially functional rearrangments are listed. One clone defined by a nonfunctional rearrangement accounted for 2 of the 17 nonfunctional rearrangements obtained in total. This clone could not be assigned to a clone defined by a potentially functional rearrangement. Within the parenchyma, CD8+ T cells outnumbered CD4+ T cells by a factor of five to six, and roughly by a factor of three in the perivascular location.
Summary of Single Cell PCR Analysis of T Cells Micromanipulated from MS Lesions of Cases 1 and 2
| Samples analyzed | Positive for at least onespecific PCR product | Total no. of potentially functional rearrangements | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 547 single parenchymal T cells | 141/547 (26%) | 133 |
| 107 samples of perivascular cells | 60/107 (56%) | 86 | |
| Case 2 | 251 single parenchymal T cells | 88/251 (35%) | 76 |
| 33 samples of perivascular cells | 26/33 (79%) | 46 | |
| Controls | 90 micromanipulated GFAP+ astrocytes | 0/90 | — |
| 90 buffer samples | 0/90 | — | |
| 90 water controls | 0/90 | — | |
| 90 single FACS®-sorted T cells | 66/90 (73%) | 58 |
Frozen sections of MS lesions were used to micromanipulate samples of 5–10 cells from perivascular infiltrates and single parenchymal T cells located outside of perivascular infiltrates. TCR-β gene rearrangements were amplified from these samples. Single astrocytes micromanipulated from adjacent sections, aliquots of the buffer covering the sections during the micromanipulation procedure, and control tubes containing PCR buffer but no cells served as negative controls. Single T cells sorted from blood of healthy donors were used to control for the efficiency of single target amplification. Among the 448 rearrangements that were amplified in total from micromanipulated and control T cells and for which the reading frame could be unequivocally determined, 49 were nonfunctional (11%; i.e., either stop codon in CDR3, rearrangement of a pseudogene, or out-of-frame rearrangement). As this study focused on the detection of potentially functional rearrangements, additional bands amplified from single cells that may potentially represent nonfunctional rearrangements were not necessarily sequenced. Therefore, our results probably underestimate the prevalence of nonfunctional rearrangements in human T cells. To exclude the possibility that a substantial number of rearrangements was derived from γ/δ instead of α/β T cells (potentially functional TCR-β gene rearrangements were described in γ/δ T cells [reference 65]), adjacent tissue sections were stained for TCR-γ/δ or -α/β. In both cases, γ/δ T cells accounted for <3% of all T cells.
Case 1: CDR3 Nucleotide and Deduced Amino Acid Sequences of TCR-β Gene Rearrangements Amplified from Micromanipulated T Cells
| Clone/sample | Vβ | VNDN | J | Jβ | CDR3 length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A278 | 11S1 | CASSE | EKLFFG | 1S4 | 10 | |
| TGTGCCAGCAGTGAATCCGGATCTGGC | GAAAAACTGTTTTTTGGC | |||||
| 7 | 11S1 | CASSE | EKLFFG | 1S4 | 10 | |
| TGTGCCAGCAGTGAAAGTGGGTCGGGG | GAAAAACTGTTTTTTGGC | |||||
| 1 | 6S5 | CASSL | DYGYTF G | 1S2 | 11 | |
| H518 | 13S3 | CATGV | EQFFG | 2S1 | 10 | |
Sequences A278 and H518 were both amplified from samples of perivascular cells (CD8+ clones 1 and 7 are introduced in Table ). CDR3 sequences are shown from the conserved cysteine of the Vβ to the conserved FG motif of the Jβ elements. Amino acids of the common SGSG motif are shown in bold. CDR3 lengths definition was as in Moss and Bell (reference 66).
Figure 2Detection of clone 10 (identified in brain tissue of case 2) in peripheral blood T cells by CDR3 spectratyping analysis. mRNA extracted from FACS®-sorted CD8+ T cells was reverse transcribed. TCR-β cDNA was amplified using 1 Cβ- and 26 Vβ-specific primers. PCR products were used as templates in runoff reactions with fluorescently labeled Jβ-specific primers, and runoff products were analyzed on an automated DNA sequencer. The products shown were amplified with the Vβ14-Cβ primer pair and labeled with an Jβ1S1-specific primer in the runoff reaction. The spectratypes correspond to the blood samples obtained 12 mo (top) and 31 mo (bottom) after brain surgery. The prominent peaks marked by the arrows potentially represented the rearrangement of clone 10 (same V-J combination and CDR3 length). Direct sequencing of the Vβ14-Jβ1S1 PCR products resulted in mixed sequences that potentially contained the CDR3 sequence of clone 10. The products were cloned into a plasmid vector. After transformation of Escherichia coli and sequence analysis of plasmid DNA from bacterial colonies, the V region sequence of clone 10 was identified in 7 of 26 colonies (“12 months”) and 7 of 12 colonies (“31 months”).
Detection of Clone 8 (Identified in Brain Tissue of Case 2) in Peripheral Blood CD8+CD45RO+ T Cells by Clone-specific PCR
| Cell samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood sample; no. of cells per PCR tube | PCR specific for V region of clone no. | Analyzed by clone-specific PCR | Positive for specific product |
| 12 mo; 103 | 2 | 10 | 0/10 |
| 31 mo; 103 | 2 | 10 | 1/10 |
| 12 mo; 103 | 3 | 9 | 0/9 |
| 12 mo; 5 × 102 | 3 | 1 | 0/1 |
| 12 mo; 102 | 3 | 5 | 0/5 |
| 31 mo; 103 | 3 | 10 | 0/10 |
| 12 mo; 103 | 8 | 10 | 6/10 |
| 31 mo; 103 | 8 | 10 | 8/10 |
| 31 mo; 102 | 8 | 20 | 2/20 |
Each set of primers consisted of the Vβ-specific primer and a nested pair of CDR3-specific primers. The clonal V region sequences were inserted into plasmid vectors, and the resulting constructs were stably transfected into Jurkat cells. To positively control single target amplification of the clonal V region sequence, single Jurkat control cells carrying a single copy of the respective V region DNA were sorted into tubes containing, as indicated, 103 or 102 irrelevant CD8+CD45RO+ T cells from a healthy donor. These samples were analyzed in parallel with the T cell samples from blood of case 2 under identical conditions (results of control amplifications are discussed in Materials and Methods).