Literature DB >> 10934004

Hydrodynamics, shell shape, behavior and survivorship in the owl limpet Lottia gigantea.

M W Denny1, C A Blanchette.   

Abstract

On wave-swept rocky shores, limpets are subjected to water velocities in excess of 20 m s(-1), which may impose large hydrodynamic forces. Despite the extreme severity of this flow environment, predictions from conical models suggest that limpets' shells are typically far from the optimal shape that would minimize the risk of dislodgment, a deviation that is allowed by the high tenacity of the limpets' adhesive system. In this study, we test this conclusion using an actual limpet. The shell of Lottia gigantea differs substantially from the hydrodynamic optimum in that its apex is displaced anteriorly to form a plough, which is used to defend the limpet's territory. The hydrodynamic effects of this shape are similar to those observed in conical models: the animal experiences an increased lift when facing into the flow and a decreased lift when the flow is at its back. However, neither effect has a substantial impact on the risk of dislodgment. When the animal is stationary, its adhesion to the substratum is very strong, and its risk of being dislodged is small regardless of its orientation to the flow and despite its sub-optimal shape. In contrast, when the animal is crawling rapidly, its adhesion is substantially decreased, and it would probably be dislodged by rapid flow even if the shell were shaped optimally. The risk of dislodgment by waves is therefore functionally independent of shell shape. In essence, despite the extremely high water velocities to which this species is subjected, its shell has had the 'permission' of the flow environment to respond to other selective factors, in particular those associated with its aggressive, territorial behavior. The result is a shell that is both a potent territorial weapon and a functional (albeit less than optimal) hydrodynamic shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10934004     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.17.2623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Wave energy and swimming performance shape coral reef fish assemblages.

Authors:  C J Fulton; D R Bellwood; P C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Trying to fit in: are patterns of orientation of a keystone grazer set by behavioural responses to ecosystem engineers or wave action?

Authors:  Clarissa M L Fraser; Ross A Coleman; Frank Seebacher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Shell properties of commercial clam Chamelea gallina are influenced by temperature and solar radiation along a wide latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Francesca Gizzi; Maria Giulia Caccia; Ginevra Allegra Simoncini; Arianna Mancuso; Michela Reggi; Simona Fermani; Leonardo Brizi; Paola Fantazzini; Marco Stagioni; Giuseppe Falini; Corrado Piccinetti; Stefano Goffredo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Photo images, 3D/CT data and mtDNA of the freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Kyushu and Ryukyu Islands, Japan, with SEM/EDS analysis of the shell.

Authors:  Yuichi Kano; Yoshihisa Kurita; Kazuki Kanno; Kengo Saito; Hironori Hayashi; Norio Onikura; Takeshi Yamasaki
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2019-01-28

5.  Adaptive responses and invasion: the role of plasticity and evolution in snail shell morphology.

Authors:  Erica J Kistner; Mark F Dybdahl
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Adaptation to dislodgement risk on wave-swept rocky shores in the snail Littorina saxatilis.

Authors:  Guénolé Le Pennec; Roger K Butlin; Per R Jonsson; Ann I Larsson; Jessica Lindborg; Erik Bergström; Anja M Westram; Kerstin Johannesson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.