Literature DB >> 10933328

Cardiac pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: impact of pacing site for optimizing left ventricular resynchronization.

C Pappone1, S Rosanio, G Oreto, M Tocchi, S Gulletta, A Salvati, C Dicandia, V Santinelli, P Mazzone, F Veglia, J Ding, L Sallusti, J Spinelli, G Vicedomini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute left ventricular pacing has been associated with hemodynamic improvement in patients with congestive heart failure and wide QRS complex. We hypothesized that pacing two left ventricular sites simultaneously would produce faster activation and better systolic function than single-site pacing.
METHODS: We selected 14 heart failure patients (NYHA functional class III or IV) in normal sinus rhythm with left bundle branch block and QRS > 150 ms. An 8F dual micromanometer catheter was placed in the aorta for measuring +dP/dt (mmHg/s), aortic pulse pressure (mmHg), and end-diastolic pressure (mmHg). Pacing leads were positioned via coronary veins at the posterior base and lateral wall. Patients were acutely paced VDD at the posterior base, lateral wall, and both sites (dual-site) with 5 atrioventricular delays (from 8 ms to PR -30 ms). Pacing sequences were executed in randomized order using a custom external computer (FlexStim, Guidant CRM).
RESULTS: Dual-site pacing increased peak +dP/dt significantly more than posterior base and lateral wall pacing. Dual-site and posterior base pacing raised aortic pulse pressure significantly more than lateral wall pacing. Dual-site pacing shortened QRS duration by 22 %, whereas posterior base and lateral wall pacing increased it by 2 and 12%, respectively (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: In heart failure patients with left bundle branch block, dual-site pacing improves systolic function more than single-site stimulation. Improved ventricular activation synchrony, expressed by paced QRS narrowing, may account for the additional benefit of dual- vs single-site pacing in enhancing contractility. This novel approach deserves consideration for future heart failure pacing studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10933328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital Heart J        ISSN: 1129-471X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

2.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  P D Lambiase; A Rinaldi; J Hauck; M Mobb; D Elliott; S Mohammad; J S Gill; C A Bucknall
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping for cardiac resynchronisation therapy: a "slow conduction" towards the fast solution.

Authors:  P Della Bella; C Carbucicchio
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response.

Authors:  Sylvain Ploux; Zachary Whinnett; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Venous valves within left ventricular coronary veins.

Authors:  Sara E Anderson; Jason L Quill; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Collateral approach for LV lead implantation in a case with abnormal venous anatomy.

Authors:  Harinder K Bali; Kapil K Chattree; Surinder K Bali; Hiteshi K C Chauhan; Chandra P Shukla
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-09-12

7.  Impact of left ventricular lead position on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Kleemann; Torsten Becker; Margit Strauss; Ngoc Dyck; Steffen Schneider; Udo Weisse; Werner Saggau; Bernd Cornelius; Günter Layer; Karlheinz Seidl
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.