OBJECTIVES: To determine if published figures on the proportion of articles included in systematic reviews and identified in electronic databases are applicable to an example from medical imaging. METHODS: A systematic review was performed. Additionally, sensitivity and precision of a MEDLINE search were compared with values from three published searches, each customized for a specific field. RESULTS: All articles included in the systematic review were in electronic databases. The MEDLINE search had low precision compared with searches in other fields. CONCLUSIONS: In a specific area of medical imaging, electronic databases, including MEDLINE, are reliable sources of articles.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if published figures on the proportion of articles included in systematic reviews and identified in electronic databases are applicable to an example from medical imaging. METHODS: A systematic review was performed. Additionally, sensitivity and precision of a MEDLINE search were compared with values from three published searches, each customized for a specific field. RESULTS: All articles included in the systematic review were in electronic databases. The MEDLINE search had low precision compared with searches in other fields. CONCLUSIONS: In a specific area of medical imaging, electronic databases, including MEDLINE, are reliable sources of articles.
Authors: Marie E Westwood; Steven Kelly; Elizabeth Berry; John M Bamford; Michael J Gough; C Mark Airey; James F M Meaney; Linda M Davies; Jane Cullingworth; Michael A Smith Journal: BMJ Date: 2002-01-26