Literature DB >> 10931766

The influence of stimulus deviance on electrophysiologic and behavioral responses to novel events.

K R Daffner1, L F Scinto, V Calvo, R Faust, M M Mesulam, W C West, P J Holcomb.   

Abstract

This study investigated the role of stimulus deviance in determining electrophysiologic and behavioral responses to "novelty." Stimulus deviance was defined in terms of differences either from the immediately preceding context or from long-term experience. Subjects participated in a visual event-related potential (ERP) experiment, in which they controlled the duration of stimulus viewing with a button press, which served as a measure of exploratory behavior. Each of the three experimental conditions included a frequent repetitive background stimulus and infrequent stimuli that deviated from the background stimulus. In one condition, both background and deviant stimuli were simple, easily recognizable geometric figures. In another condition, both background and deviant stimuli were unusual/unfamiliar figures, and in a third condition, the background stimulus was a highly unusual figure, and the deviant stimuli were simple, geometric shapes. Deviant stimuli elicited larger N2-P3 amplitudes and longer viewing durations than the repetitive background stimulus, even when the deviant stimuli were simple, familiar shapes and the background stimulus was a highly unusual figure. Compared to simple, familiar deviant stimuli, unusual deviant stimuli elicited larger N2-P3 amplitudes and longer viewing times. Within subjects, the deviant stimuli that evoked the largest N2-P3 responses also elicited the longest viewing durations. We conclude that deviance from both immediate context and long-term prior experience contribute to the response to novelty, with the combination generating the largest N2-P3 amplitude and the most sustained attention. The amplitude of the N2-P3 may reflect how much "uncertainty" is evoked by a novel visual stimulus and signal the need for further exploration and cognitive processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931766     DOI: 10.1162/089892900562219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Cognitive status impacts age-related changes in attention to novel and target events in normal adults.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Hyemi Chong; Jenna Riis; Dorene M Rentz; David A Wolk; Andrew E Budson; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Enhanced attention capture by emotional stimuli in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Verónica Mäki-Marttunen; Venla Kuusinen; Maarja Brause; Jari Peräkylä; Markus Polvivaara; Rodolfo dos Santos Ribeiro; Juha Öhman; Kaisa M Hartikainen
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Auditory and Visual Oddball Stimulus Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and the Psychosis Risk Syndrome: Forecasting Psychosis Risk With P300.

Authors:  Holly K Hamilton; Scott W Woods; Brian J Roach; Katiah Llerena; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Does compensatory neural activity survive old-old age?

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Xue Sun; Elise C Tarbi; Dorene M Rentz; Phillip J Holcomb; Jenna L Riis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Detecting novelty and significance.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Margaret M Bradley; Maurizio Codispoti; Peter J Lang
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The Impact of Deliberative Strategy Dissociates ERP Components Related to Conflict Processing vs. Reinforcement Learning.

Authors:  Christopher M Warren; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The effects of visual imagery on face identification: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jianhui Wu; Hongxia Duan; Xing Tian; Peipei Wang; Kan Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Childhood predictors of states of anxiety.

Authors:  Jerome Kagan
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.986

9.  Abnormal distracter processing in adults with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Frank Marzinzik; Michael Wahl; Doris Krüger; Laura Gentschow; Michael Colla; Fabian Klostermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Screening Mechanism Differentiating True from False Pain during Empathy.

Authors:  Ya-Bin Sun; Xiao-Xiao Lin; Wen Ye; Ning Wang; Jin-Yan Wang; Fei Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.