Literature DB >> 10931451

Prognostic factors for patients with small cell lung carcinoma: analysis of a series of 763 patients included in 4 consecutive prospective trials with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

M Paesmans1, J P Sculier, J Lecomte, J Thiriaux, P Libert, R Sergysels, G Bureau, G Dabouis, O Van Cutsem, P Mommen, V Ninane, J Klastersky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to identify prognostic factors for response to chemotherapy, overall survival, and long term survival of patients with small cell lung carcinoma and to construct a classification of patients on the basis of their expected overall survival.
METHODS: In the 763 patients registered in 4 consecutive clinical trials conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party from 1982 to 1993, the impact of 21 pretreatment variables assessable in a routine practice was analyzed for the various outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
RESULTS: The key prognostic role of disease extent was confirmed for all the outcomes. Additional independent prognostic factors for response to chemotherapy were gender, neutrophil count, and hemoglobin level; for overall survival, these factors were Karnofsky performance status, gender, and neutrophil count. Recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithms (RECPAM) analysis classified patients into 4 groups, taking into consideration disease extent, Karnofsky performance status, age, gender, and neutrophil count. Median survival times for the 4 groups were 60, 47, 36, and 28 weeks, respectively. For long term survival, defined as a minimum survival of 2 years (9% of the patients), Karnofsky performance status was the only independent predictive factor, along with the achievement of a complete response (if this was taken into consideration). Small cell lung carcinoma remained the main cause of death among these patients. Cure was infrequent, with only 14 patients alive and disease free at 5 years (1.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study the long term prognosis associated with small cell lung carcinoma was poor. The well-known prognostic values of disease extent and Karnofsky performance status were confirmed, but the authors also identified age and gender (which are more controversial) as independent characteristics, in addition to citing the role of complete response in the attainment of long term survival. The independent role of neutrophils observed by the authors. must be validated by further studies. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931451     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<523::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  62 in total

1.  Application of serum NY-ESO-1 antibody assay for early SCLC diagnosis.

Authors:  Jihua Yang; Shunchang Jiao; Jingbo Kang; Rong Li; Guanzhong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ryool Oh; Ji-Hyoung Seo; Ari Chong; Jung-Joon Min; Ho-Chun Song; Young-Chul Kim; Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predicts overall survival of small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Shaodong Hong; Ting Zhou; Wenfeng Fang; Cong Xue; Zhihuang Hu; Tao Qin; Yanna Tang; Yue Chen; Yuxiang Ma; Yunpeng Yang; Xue Hou; Yan Huang; Hongyun Zhao; Yuanyuan Zhao; Li Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-12-20

4.  Membrane-Associated Proteinase 3 on Granulocytes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Inhibits T Cell Proliferation.

Authors:  Tian-Hui Yang; Lisa S St John; Haven R Garber; Celine Kerros; Kathryn E Ruisaard; Karen Clise-Dwyer; Gheath Alatrash; Qing Ma; Jeffrey J Molldrem
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  The influence of preoperative dependency on mortality, functional recovery and complications after microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Martin N Stienen; David Y Zhang; Morgan Broggi; Dominik Seggewiss; Stefano Villa; Silvia Schiavolin; Oliver Bozinov; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Johannes Sarnthein; Paolo Ferroli; Luca Regli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Lysosome-associated protein transmembrane-4β-35 is a novel independent prognostic factor in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Man Qiao; Guohua Hu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-25

7.  Impact of [18F]FDG-PET on the primary staging of small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  I Brink; T Schumacher; M Mix; S Ruhland; E Stoelben; W Digel; M Henke; N Ghanem; E Moser; E U Nitzsche
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  The prognostic factors in the elderly patients with small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis from a single cancer institute.

Authors:  Sujing Liu; Hongbo Guo; Li Kong; Huihui Li; Yan Zhang; Hui Zhu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Survival and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jian Li; Chun-Hua Dai; Ping Chen; Jian-Nong Wu; Quan-Lei Bao; Hao Qiu; Xiao-Qin Li
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Metastatic renal carcinoma comprehensive prognostic system.

Authors:  J Atzpodien; P Royston; T Wandert; M Reitz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.