BACKGROUND: Potent allergens such as hymenoptera venoms are capable of inducing severe and life threatening clinical reactions. Percentage of false negative results obtained by the usual diagnostical methods is comprised between 10 and 25%. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the sensitivity and the specificity of cellular tests and particularly evaluation of a new flow cytometric method. METHODS: Forty-five allergic patients having experienced a local, a systemic reaction or an anaphylactic shock and 10 controls having undergone hymenoptera stings without clinical reactions were selected on the basis of the clinical history, skin tests and specific IgE. Three cellular tests were performed on the same cell suspensions and in the presence of 2 ng/mL of rIL3: histamine release (RIA), leukotriene C4 release (ELISA) and basophil activation test (flow cytometry after double anti-IgE FITC, anti-CD63 PE labelling). RESULTS: As compared to the clinical history, sensitivities of skin tests, specific IgE, flow cytometry, histamine release and leukotriene release were, respectively; 85%, 88%, 100%, 89% and 100%. Flow cytometric analysis of basophil activation showed a significant decrease of the mean fluorescence density and number of IgE positive cells and a significant increase of the number of CD63 positive cells. The 10 controls tested by flow cytometry were negative. CONCLUSION: As compared to the clinical history and to the other parameters tested here, flow cytometry showed a high sensitivity and a high specificity. The excellent correlation observed between this method and the other cellular tests such as histamine and leukotriene release are in favour of the specificity of flow cytomery and in favour of the use of this method for venom allergy diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Potent allergens such as hymenoptera venoms are capable of inducing severe and life threatening clinical reactions. Percentage of false negative results obtained by the usual diagnostical methods is comprised between 10 and 25%. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the sensitivity and the specificity of cellular tests and particularly evaluation of a new flow cytometric method. METHODS: Forty-five allergicpatients having experienced a local, a systemic reaction or an anaphylactic shock and 10 controls having undergone hymenoptera stings without clinical reactions were selected on the basis of the clinical history, skin tests and specific IgE. Three cellular tests were performed on the same cell suspensions and in the presence of 2 ng/mL of rIL3: histamine release (RIA), leukotriene C4 release (ELISA) and basophil activation test (flow cytometry after double anti-IgE FITC, anti-CD63 PE labelling). RESULTS: As compared to the clinical history, sensitivities of skin tests, specific IgE, flow cytometry, histamine release and leukotriene release were, respectively; 85%, 88%, 100%, 89% and 100%. Flow cytometric analysis of basophil activation showed a significant decrease of the mean fluorescence density and number of IgE positive cells and a significant increase of the number of CD63 positive cells. The 10 controls tested by flow cytometry were negative. CONCLUSION: As compared to the clinical history and to the other parameters tested here, flow cytometry showed a high sensitivity and a high specificity. The excellent correlation observed between this method and the other cellular tests such as histamine and leukotriene release are in favour of the specificity of flow cytomery and in favour of the use of this method for venom allergy diagnosis.
Authors: Hans Jürgen Hoffmann; Edward F Knol; Martha Ferrer; Lina Mayorga; Vito Sabato; Alexandra F Santos; Bernadette Eberlein; Anna Nopp; Donald MacGlashan Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 4.806
Authors: Gunter J Sturm; Chunsheng Jin; Bettina Kranzelbinder; Wolfgang Hemmer; Eva M Sturm; Antonia Griesbacher; Akos Heinemann; Jutta Vollmann; Friedrich Altmann; Karl Crailsheim; Margarete Focke; Werner Aberer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pauline E van Eeden; Michael D Wiese; Susan Aulfrey; Belinda J Hales; Shelley F Stone; Simon G A Brown Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peshala Gunasekara; S M Handunnetti; Sunil Premawansa; Pradeep Kaluarachchi; Chandima Karunatilake; Indra P Ratnayake; R K S Dias; G A S Premakumara; W M D K Dasanayake; Suranjith L Seneviratne; Rajiva de Silva Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.406
Authors: Aida Abd El-Wahed; Nermeen Yosri; Hanem H Sakr; Ming Du; Ahmed F M Algethami; Chao Zhao; Ahmed H Abdelazeem; Haroon Elrasheid Tahir; Saad H D Masry; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim; Syed Ghulam Musharraf; Islam El-Garawani; Guoyin Kai; Yahya Al Naggar; Shaden A M Khalifa; Hesham R El-Seedi Journal: Toxins (Basel) Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 4.546