Literature DB >> 10931114

Comparison of genetically engineered hypoallergenic rBet v 1 derivatives with rBet v 1 wild-type by skin prick and intradermal testing: results obtained in a French population.

G Pauli1, A Purohit, J P Oster, F De Blay, S Vrtala, V Niederberger, D Kraft, R Valenta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bet v 1, the major allergen in birch pollen, is recognized by more than 90% of patients allergic to birch in northern and central Europe. Immunotherapy is commonly performed with birch pollen extracts. Recently, hypoallergenic derivatives of Bet v 1 (rBet v 1 fragments, rBet v 1 dimer and trimer) were constructed and purified.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the allergenic activity of wild-type rBet v 1 with recombinant Bet v 1 derivatives (rBet v 1 fragments, dimer and trimer) with potentially reduced anaphylactic activity by skin testing in a French population.
METHODS: Among the 36 birch pollen allergic patients included in the study, 29 were tested by skin prick testing and 30 by intradermal injections with purified monosubstances: rBet v 1 fragments (F1: aa1-74 and F2: aa75-160), Bet v 1 dimer and trimer. Intradermal tests were performed by the end-point intradermal titration method. Eight of the intradermally-tested patients were previously hyposensitized. Tests were performed over a period of 6 months (before, during and after birch pollen season); Bet v 1-specific IgE and IgG4 subclass responses were measured by immunoblotting and ELISA.
RESULTS: All patients showed lower reactivity with the modified rBet v 1 allergens, both in skin prick and intradermal tests. In 25 and 23 out of 29 patients the lowest concentration of fragment 1 and 2, respectively, resulting in a positive prick test was 100-fold higher than the lowest concentration of monomer resulting in a positive prick test. For dimer it was 100-fold or more in 25 out of 29 patients, and for trimer it was 100-fold or superior in 26 out of 29 patients. By intradermal testing, the end-point concentration was 160-fold higher for trimer than for monomer in 24 patients and 40-fold higher in five patients. For the two fragments the end-point concentration was 160-fold higher in 20 out of 22 patients.
CONCLUSION: Genetically modified hypoallergenic derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1 showed reduced capacity to induce immediate type skin reactions. They may represent candidate molecules for immunotherapy of birch pollen allergy with reduced risk of anaphylactic side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931114     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00869.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  13 in total

Review 1.  Recombinant allergens.

Authors:  C Grégoire; M D Chapman
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Next generation immunotherapy for tree pollen allergies.

Authors:  Yan Su; Eliezer Romeu-Bonilla; Teri Heiland
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Recombinant Allergens in Structural Biology, Diagnosis, and Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Angelika Tscheppe; Heimo Breiteneder
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 4.  Clinical practice: Allergen-specific immunotherapy in children: facts and FAQs.

Authors:  Zsolt Szépfalusi; Saskia Gruber; Thomas Eiwegger; Eleonora Dehlink
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Recombinant allergens: the present and the future.

Authors:  Marek Jutel; Katarzyna Solarewicz-Madejek; Sylwia Smolinska
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Vaccination with genetically engineered allergens prevents progression of allergic disease.

Authors:  V Niederberger; F Horak; S Vrtala; S Spitzauer; M-T Krauth; P Valent; J Reisinger; M Pelzmann; B Hayek; M Kronqvist; G Gafvelin; H Grönlund; A Purohit; R Suck; H Fiebig; O Cromwell; G Pauli; M van Hage-Hamsten; R Valenta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Tregs and allergic disease.

Authors:  Douglas S Robinson; Mark Larché; Stephen R Durham
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Mechanisms underlying allergy vaccination with recombinant hypoallergenic allergen derivatives.

Authors:  Birgit Linhart; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Genetic engineering of trimers of hypoallergenic fragments of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, for allergy vaccination.

Authors:  Susanne Vrtala; Monika Fohr; Raffaela Campana; Christian Baumgartner; Peter Valent; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Genetically engineered vaccines.

Authors:  Wayne R Thomas; Belinda J Hales; Wendy-Anne Smith
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.