Literature DB >> 10930918

Safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate under sedoanalgesia.

J Chander1, U Gupta, R Mehra, V K Ramteke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of sedoanalgesia (local anaesthesia with sedation) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 50 patients with BPH, two-thirds of whom were graded III-IV using the American Society of Anesthesiologists system. All patients had a topical instillation of lignocaine jelly 2% into their urethra, combined with 1% lignocaine (100-200 mg) with 1 : 400 000 adrenaline infiltration of the prostate via the perineal route. Sedation and anxiolysis were obtained with the intramuscular pethidine (0.5 mg/kg) and promethazine (1 mg/kg). Standard TURP was then carried out, with pain monitored during surgery using a visual analogue scale (VAS, maximum 10 points) and the amount of analgesic required after TURP recorded. The amount of prostatic tissue excised, duration of surgery, blood requirement, catheter interval, complications and hospital stay were recorded. The effectiveness of TURP was assessed by comparing symptom scores, uroflowmetry and postvoid residual volume before and after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean intraoperative VAS was < or = 1 at any time during or after surgery; no patient required any postoperative analgesics. Only two patients complained of discomfort during the procedure and even they were comfortable after a supplemental dose of pethidine (12.5 mg). There were no conversions to general or regional anaesthesia. No blood transfusion was required in any patient. All patients began a normal diet 30 min after surgery and all were discharged within 48 h of surgery. There were no deaths; one patient had transient urinary incontinence and three had mild urinary tract infection.
CONCLUSION: Sedoanalgesia was an effective, safe and simple alternative to general or regional anaesthesia for TURP in patients with BPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10930918     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00754.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  M P Wirth; O W Hakenberg; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Pudendal nerve block in HDR-brachytherapy patients: do we really need general or regional anesthesia?

Authors:  Marcus Schenck; Catarina Schenck; Herbert Rübben; Martin Stuschke; Tim Schneider; Andreas Eisenhardt; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Urological surgery with analogosedation and local anesthesia. What makes sense?].

Authors:  S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; M Schenck
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Spinal versus General Anaesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management during Transurethral Procedures.

Authors:  Stavros I Tyritzis; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioanna Vasileiou; Georgia Fotopoulou; Georgios Koritsiadis; Vasileios Migdalis; Anastasios Michalakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2011-07-12

5.  Day care bipolar transurethral resection vs photoselective vaporisation under sedoanalgesia: A prospective, randomised study of the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Rajeev Sood; T Manasa; Hemant Goel; Ritesh Kumar Singh; Rajpal Singh; Nikhil Khattar; Praveen Pandey
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-10-12

Review 6.  Impact of interventional therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia on quality of life and sexual function.

Authors:  A Hoznek; C C Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.