Literature DB >> 10930914

Evaluation of the 1997 tumour, nodes and metastases classification of renal cell carcinoma: experience in 172 patients.

R Minervini1, A Minervini, N Fontana, C Traversi, R Cristofani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic relevance of the 1987 and 1997 tumour, nodes and metastases (TNM) systems for staging renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in predicting patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 172 consecutive patients with RCC who underwent radical nephrectomy from January 1990 to October 1997 was evaluated comparatively according to the 1987 and 1997 TNM classifications. The median (range) follow-up of the patients was 50 (19-112) months. The probability of survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, using the log-rank test to estimate differences among levels of the analysed variables.
RESULTS: Using the 1997 TNM classification resulted in a redistribution of 99 patients from stage pT2 on the 1987 TNM classification to stage pT1. As the staging criteria for pT3 and pT4 did not change, there was no re-classification of these patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a similar separation in 5-year survival between stage pT1 and pT2 using both systems; 100% vs 80% for the 1987 TNM and 86% vs 69% for the 1997 TNM systems. This difference in survival rates between patients with pT1 and pT2 disease was statistically significant only for the 1997 TNM staging system. However, when the 1987 TNM staging classification was applied, the separation in 5-year survival rates between pT2 and pT3 disease was greater.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the prognostic relevance of the 1987 TNM system, as established in the present patients. The 1997 TNM classification resulted in a better stratification of patients with pT1-pT2 disease, but had similar prognostic value for pT2 and pT3 disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10930914     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00826.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Jean Jacques Patard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prognostic significance of perirenal infiltration in renal cell carcinoma (<7 cm).

Authors:  Seongyub Oh; Jangho Yoon; Dongil Kang; Heung Lae Cho; Jae-il Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jun-Hang Luo; Fang-Jian Zhou; Dan Xie; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Bing Liao; Hong-Wei Zhao; Yu-Ping Dai; Ling-Wu Chen; Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Detection, staging and surveillance in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Isaac R Francis
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Differential expression of prognostic proteomic markers in primary tumour, venous tumour thrombus and metastatic renal cell cancer tissue and correlation with patient outcome.

Authors:  Alexander Laird; Fiach C O'Mahony; Jyoti Nanda; Antony C P Riddick; Marie O'Donnell; David J Harrison; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Novel concepts in the staging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dan Leibovici; Arie Lindner; Avishay Sella; Amnon Zisman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.