Literature DB >> 10929330

[Criteria for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis between 40 degrees and 50 degrees. Surgical vs. conservative therapy].

C Hopf1.   

Abstract

The treatment of idiopathic scoliosis over 40 degrees (Cobb) during the growth period is under discussion concerning the indication for conservative or surgical treatment. Curve progression depends on the degree of the frontal and sagittal deformity, vertebral rotation, rigidity of the curve, the skeletal age, the age and sex of the patient, the familial frequency of scoliosis and the location of the curve. In scoliosis over 40 degrees progression is fast and the possibilities for successful conservative brace treatment are reduced during the growth period. Progression occurs more frequently in thoracic and double major scolioses, especially in young patients (Risser sign 0 and 1). Predictive factors of a successful brace treatment are the correction of scoliosis and rotation; deterioration of both during the brace treatment leads to poor results. Evaluating the flexibility of the sagittal profile is important, as is primary correction of 30-50% in the brace during the 3 months. Operative correction of small primary curves reduces the fusion length, operation time, and blood loss and is followed by a reduction in loading on the adjacent vertebral segments in comparison to the long fusions necessary in more structural and double major scolioses. So far it is not possible to make an equivalent judgment of the frequency of the "crankshaft" phenomenon and the treatment necessary in young patients (Rissersign 0 and 1) treated by dorsal instrumentation alone, but temporary brace treatment may be considered in those cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10929330     DOI: 10.1007/s001320050488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  7 in total

1.  Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24.

Authors:  Karen Petra Weigert; Linda Marie Nygaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Electromyogram and kinematic analysis of lateral bending in idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  V Feipel; C E Aubin; O C Ciolofan; M Beauséjour; H Labelle; P A Mathieu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Effect of different surgical strategies on screw forces after correction of scoliosis with a VDS implant.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Michael Richter; Thomas Zander; Constantin Klöckner; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effect of compliance to a Rigo System Cheneau brace and a specific exercise programme on idiopathic scoliosis curvature: a comparative study: SOSORT 2014 award winner.

Authors:  LouAnn Rivett; Aimee Stewart; Joanne Potterton
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-05-30

5.  Characteristics of Cobb angle distribution in the main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Jianping Fan; Hui Shen; Changwei Yang; Yuanyuan Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The importance of curve severity, type and instrumentation strategy in the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an in silico clinical trial on 64 cases.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Andrea Cina; Matteo Panico; Tito Bassani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - case report of a patient with clinical deterioration after surgery.

Authors:  Hans-Rudolf Weiss
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2007-12-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.