Literature DB >> 10928215

Spectral sensitivity of wild-type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster larvae.

J M Warrick1, M F Vakil, L Tompkins.   

Abstract

Wild-type (Canton-S) Drosophila melanogaster larvae are generally repelled by white light. Mutant larval photokinesis A (lphA) larvae are less strongly repelled than controls. Mutant Larval photokinesis B (LphB) larvae are unresponsive to light, as are larvae from LI2, an isofemale line whose progenitors were recently derived from a natural population. To characterize the behavior of larvae from the mutant stocks and the isofemale line more precisely, we determined the range of wavelengths that repel wild-type (Canton-S) D. melanogaster larvae and identified wavelengths to which larvae are most sensitive. In comparison to adult flies, Canton-S larvae are much less sensitive to white light and respond to a narrower range of wavelengths. The wavelengths to which Canton-S larvae are maximally sensitive are 500 nm (green), 420 nm (indigo), and 380 nm (ultraviolet). Mutant lphA larvae respond abnormally to green and indigo light but are as strongly repelled by ultraviolet light as controls. In contrast, mutant LphB larvae and larvae from the LI2 isofemale line are unresponsive to green, indigo, or ultraviolet light. Thus, lphA larvae have a wavelength-specific defect, while LphB and LI2 larvae are generally unresponsive to wavelengths that repel wild-type larvae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10928215     DOI: 10.3109/01677069909083471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogenet        ISSN: 0167-7063            Impact factor:   1.250


  4 in total

1.  Age- and Wavelength-Dependency of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis and Behavioral Responses to Natural Lighting Conditions.

Authors:  Tim-Henning Humberg; Simon G Sprecher
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.558

2.  Reward signaling in a recurrent circuit of dopaminergic neurons and peptidergic Kenyon cells.

Authors:  Radostina Lyutova; Mareike Selcho; Maximilian Pfeuffer; Dennis Segebarth; Jens Habenstein; Astrid Rohwedder; Felix Frantzmann; Christian Wegener; Andreas S Thum; Dennis Pauls
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Interaction of light regimes and circadian clocks modulate timing of pre-adult developmental events in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pankaj Yadav; Madhumohan Thandapani; Vijay Kumar Sharma
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 1.978

4.  Circadian and Genetic Modulation of Visually-Guided Navigation in Drosophila Larvae.

Authors:  Ece Z Asirim; Tim-Henning Humberg; G Larisa Maier; Simon G Sprecher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.