BACKGROUND: Soybeans are reported to have cancer inhibitory effects, probably due to their isoflavones. Soybean hypocotyls are embryo buds of soybeans and contain a higher amount of isoflavones and other factors than soybeans themselves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of soybean protein and soybean hypocotyls as diets on the development of N-methyl-n-nitrosourea (MNU) induced tumors were examined in female F344 rats. For this trial, 120 animals were used and at 6 weeks of age, groups of 30 animals were fed diets containing casein, soy protein isolate (SPI), 1.5% soybean hypocotyls and 5% soybean hypocotyls. Three weeks later all the animals except the control animals received a first dose (37.5 mg/kg body weight) of MNU by tail vein injection. At 29 weeks of age the animals received a second MNU dose (50 mg/kg body weight). Testing was performed 42 weeks after the first MNU dose. RESULTS: Analysis of cumulative palpable tumor incidence indicated that final tumor development of the SPI diet group and the hypocotyl diet groups was less than that of the casein diet group. Tumors were detected in one or more sites from 9 out of 24 rats in the casein diet group, 5 of 20 rats in SPI diet group, 6 out of 24 rats in the 1.5% hypocotyl diet group and 6 out of 23 rats in the 5% hypocotyl diet group. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the formation of tumors during the experiment was significantly less rapid in the SPI diet group and the hypocotyl diet groups than the casein group. No difference in tumor promotion was observed between the SPI diet group and the soybean hypocotyl diet groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that dietary soybeans and soybean hypocotyls are capable of suppressing tumor promotion.
BACKGROUND:Soybeans are reported to have cancer inhibitory effects, probably due to their isoflavones. Soybean hypocotyls are embryo buds of soybeans and contain a higher amount of isoflavones and other factors than soybeans themselves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of soybean protein and soybean hypocotyls as diets on the development of N-methyl-n-nitrosourea (MNU) induced tumors were examined in female F344 rats. For this trial, 120 animals were used and at 6 weeks of age, groups of 30 animals were fed diets containing casein, soy protein isolate (SPI), 1.5% soybean hypocotyls and 5% soybean hypocotyls. Three weeks later all the animals except the control animals received a first dose (37.5 mg/kg body weight) of MNU by tail vein injection. At 29 weeks of age the animals received a second MNU dose (50 mg/kg body weight). Testing was performed 42 weeks after the first MNU dose. RESULTS: Analysis of cumulative palpable tumor incidence indicated that final tumor development of the SPI diet group and the hypocotyl diet groups was less than that of the casein diet group. Tumors were detected in one or more sites from 9 out of 24 rats in the casein diet group, 5 of 20 rats in SPI diet group, 6 out of 24 rats in the 1.5% hypocotyl diet group and 6 out of 23 rats in the 5% hypocotyl diet group. Pairwise comparisons indicated that the formation of tumors during the experiment was significantly less rapid in the SPI diet group and the hypocotyl diet groups than the casein group. No difference in tumor promotion was observed between the SPI diet group and the soybean hypocotyl diet groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that dietary soybeans and soybean hypocotyls are capable of suppressing tumor promotion.