Literature DB >> 10927966

What diagnostic devices do: the case of blood sugar measurement.

A Mol1.   

Abstract

Diagnostic devices do more than just passively register facts. They intervene in the situations in which they are put to use. The question addressed here is what this general remark may imply in specific cases. To answer this question a specific case is being analysed: that of the blood sugar measurement device that people with diabetes may use to monitor their own blood sugar levels. This device not only allows the patients concerned to better approach normal blood sugar levels, but alters what counts as normal in the first place. Using the device may shift people's attention away from their physical sensations towards the numbers measured, but it may also help them to increase their own physical self-awareness. Self-monitoring finally (something that the devices have made possible) makes patients less dependent on professionals, but it requires them to engage in self-disciplining and binds them to the outcomes of their measurement activities: their own blood sugar levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10927966     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009999119586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  1 in total

1.  Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology.

Authors:  A Mol; J Law
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.885

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Perspectives of patients with type 1 or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes on self-monitoring of blood glucose: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Johanna Hortensius; Marijke C Kars; Willem S Wierenga; Nanne Kleefstra; Henk Jg Bilo; Jaap J van der Bijl
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Debating the desirability of new biomedical technologies: lessons from the introduction of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marianne Boenink
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-03

3.  When self-tracking enters physical rehabilitation: From 'pushed' self-tracking to ongoing affective encounters in arrangements of care.

Authors:  Nete Schwennesen
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2017-08-30

4.  Chronotope disruption as a sensitizing concept for understanding chronic illness narratives.

Authors:  Tim Gomersall; Anna Madill
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Factors influencing timely initiation and completion of gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis - a qualitative study from Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Karoline Kragelund Nielsen; Thilde Rheinländer; Anil Kapur; Peter Damm; Veerasamy Seshiah; Ib C Bygbjerg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  How medical technologies shape the experience of illness.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Fredrik Svenaeus
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2018-02-03

7.  Elaboration of the Gothenburg model of person-centred care.

Authors:  Nicky Britten; Lucy Moore; Doris Lydahl; Oncel Naldemirci; Mark Elam; Axel Wolf
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics.

Authors:  Federica Lucivero; Karin R Jongsma
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Karin Rolanda Jongsma; Josephus F M van den Heuvel; Jasmijn Rake; Annelien L Bredenoord; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.773

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.