OBJECTIVE: To assess pain control in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are undergoing ovarian drilling during minilaparoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation and to evaluate the efficacy of this protocol compared with the traditional approach in terms of operative and discharge times, subsequent ovulation, and pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING:University hospitals and private day-surgery unit. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two infertile women with PCOS. INTERVENTION(S): Group A underwent minilaparoscopic ovarian drilling under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Group B (control group) was treated with traditional ovarian drilling by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative pain score in group A. Hormonal profile before and after surgery, operative and discharge times, postoperative analgesic requirements, and reproductive follow-up in both groups. RESULT(S): Group A showed a good intraoperative pain score. The hormonal profile after surgery did not differ between groups A and B. Operative times were also similar for both groups. The number of patients discharged within 2 hours after surgery was significantly higher in group A. The need for postoperative analgesics was significantly higher in group B. No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of pregnancy and ovulation rates. CONCLUSION(S): Intraoperative and postoperative local anesthesia plus conscious sedation allows outpatient bilateral ovarian drilling by minilaparoscopy to be performed without general anesthesia. The high pregnancy rates, the simplicity of the method, and the faster discharge time offer a new option for patients with PCOS who are resistant to clomiphene citrate. Moreover, ovarian cauterization can be performed simultaneously with a diagnostic minilaparoscopy and integrated into the infertility workup of these patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess pain control in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are undergoing ovarian drilling during minilaparoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation and to evaluate the efficacy of this protocol compared with the traditional approach in terms of operative and discharge times, subsequent ovulation, and pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: University hospitals and private day-surgery unit. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two infertile women with PCOS. INTERVENTION(S): Group A underwent minilaparoscopic ovarian drilling under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Group B (control group) was treated with traditional ovarian drilling by laparoscopy under general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraoperative pain score in group A. Hormonal profile before and after surgery, operative and discharge times, postoperative analgesic requirements, and reproductive follow-up in both groups. RESULT(S): Group A showed a good intraoperative pain score. The hormonal profile after surgery did not differ between groups A and B. Operative times were also similar for both groups. The number of patients discharged within 2 hours after surgery was significantly higher in group A. The need for postoperative analgesics was significantly higher in group B. No statistically significant differences were noted between the groups in terms of pregnancy and ovulation rates. CONCLUSION(S): Intraoperative and postoperative local anesthesia plus conscious sedation allows outpatient bilateral ovarian drilling by minilaparoscopy to be performed without general anesthesia. The high pregnancy rates, the simplicity of the method, and the faster discharge time offer a new option for patients with PCOS who are resistant to clomiphene citrate. Moreover, ovarian cauterization can be performed simultaneously with a diagnostic minilaparoscopy and integrated into the infertility workup of these patients.
Authors: Antonio Mercorio; Luigi Della Corte; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Cira Buonfantino; Carlo Ronsini; Giuseppe Bifulco; Pierluigi Giampaolino Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 2.948