Literature DB >> 10926949

Prediction of mortality by ultrasound screening of a general population for carotid stenosis: the Tromsø Study.

O Joakimsen1, K H Bonaa, E B Mathiesen, E Stensland-Bugge, E Arnesen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The extensive use of ultrasound examination of carotid arteries has revealed stenosis in many asymptomatic subjects, and clinical studies have shown that carotid stenosis is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death. However, information on stenosis as detected in a general population and its relation to mortality is scarce. The purpose of this population-based study was to assess whether carotid stenosis is a predictor of death.
METHODS: In 1994 to 1995, 248 subjects with suspected carotid stenosis were identified among 6727 men and women 25 to 84 years of age who were examined with ultrasound. These subjects and 496 age- and sex-matched control subjects were followed up for 4.2 years, and the number and causes of deaths were registered.
RESULTS: The unadjusted relative risk for death was 2.72 (95% CI, 1.57 to 4.75) for subjects with stenosis compared with control subjects. Adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors increased the relative risk to 3.47 (95% CI, 1.47 to 8.19). The adjusted relative risk in persons with stenosis and no cardiovascular disease or diabetes was 5.66 (95% CI, 1.53 to 20.90), which was higher than in subjects with stenosis and self-reported disease (1.79; 95% CI, 0.75 to 4.27). There was a dose-response relationship between degree of stenosis and risk of death (P=0.002 for linear trend). Carotid stenosis was a stronger predictor of death than self-reported cardiovascular disease or diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenosis is a strong and independent predictor of death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10926949     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.8.1871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  9 in total

1.  Symptomatic vs. asymptomatic plaque classification in carotid ultrasound.

Authors:  Rajendra U Acharya; Oliver Faust; A P C Alvin; S Vinitha Sree; Filippo Molinari; Luca Saba; Andrew Nicolaides; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Carotid plaque compared with intima-media thickness as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Stein Harald Johnsen; Ellisiv B Mathiesen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  The impact of carotid plaque presence and morphology on mortality outcome in cardiological patients.

Authors:  Christina Petersen; Patricia B Peçanha; Lucia Venneri; Emilio Pasanisi; Lorenza Pratali; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 4.  Carotid ultrasound assessment of patients with coronary artery disease: a useful index for risk stratification.

Authors:  Roman Komorovsky; Alessandro Desideri
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Functional Assessment of Intermediate Vascular Disease.

Authors:  Teodora Yaneva-Sirakova; Ivanichka Serbezova; Dobrin Vassilev
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Does retinopathy predict stroke recurrence in type 2 diabetes patients: A retrospective study?

Authors:  Ola Hjelmgren; Ulf Strömberg; Karl Gellerman; Anders Thurin; Madeleine Zetterberg; Göran Bergström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Alison Halliday; M Sofia Massa; Paul Sherliker; Rachel Clack; Dylan R Morris; Robert Clarke; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Sarah Lewington
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  The Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study (NOR-SYS): rationale and design.

Authors:  Annette Fromm; Lars Thomassen; Halvor Naess; Rudy Meijer; Geir Egil Eide; Jostein Kråkenes; Christian A Vedeler; Eva Gerdts; Terje H Larsen; Karel K-J Kuiper; Elin Laxdal; David Russell; Turgut Tatlisumak; Ulrike Waje-Andreassen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Bilateral carotid artery geometry using magnetic resonance angiography: a 10-year longitudinal single center study.

Authors:  Woocheol Kwon; Yeryung Kim; Jisu Kim; Junsik Jo; Seongju Jeon; Ui Yun Lee; Hyo Sung Kwak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.