Efficiency and effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation after first stroke.

PURPOSE: To investigate predictive variables of rehabilitation efficiency and achievement of rehabilitation potential following stroke rehabilitation.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 110 first-stroke patients consecutively admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation department of our university hospital from 1 January to 31 December 1997. Functional recovery was measured as improvement in the ability to perform the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument. Major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, risk factors, Brunnstrom motor recovery stage, etc.), rehabilitative (initial FIM subscore, interval from stroke onset to rehabilitation commencement, rehabilitation stay, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, marital and living status, care-giver, etc.) variables were examined.
RESULTS: The mean FIM score was 57.7 +/- 24.5 at admission and 77.3 +/- 26.3 at discharge. The mean rehabilitation efficiency (0.7 +/- 0.7) and effectiveness (30.6 +/- 24.0%) of stroke rehabilitation were determined. Rehabilitation efficiency and rehabilitation effectiveness were significantly predicted by length of stay and arm motor recovery stage, and by age and arm motor recovery stage, respectively. The variance explained only 21% of the rehabilitation efficiency and 24% of the achievement of rehabilitation potential.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the large proportion of the unexplained variance in rehabilitation efficiency and effectiveness is due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.