Literature DB >> 10925349

Lack of clinically significant cardiac dysfunction during intermediate dobutamine doses in long-term childhood cancer survivors exposed to anthracyclines.

L Lanzarini1, G Bossi, M L Laudisa, C Klersy, M Aricò.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term survivors of childhood cancer treated with anthracyclines may have subclinical cardiac dysfunction undetectable at a baseline evaluation. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has been proposed as a more sensitive screening test, but results of previous studies were influenced by selection criteria, infusion protocols, and side effects.
METHODS: We applied a modified dobutamine stress test (from 5 to 10 to 15 microg/kg, infused over a 5-minute period) and evaluated the influence on stress test results of reported risk factors for late cardiac toxicity (female sex, younger age at treatment, higher dose of anthracycline, and longer duration of follow-up). Seventy-one patients (46 male, mean age 15 +/- 5 years) treated with anthracyclines (median dose 240 mg/m(2)) 1 to 16.5 years before and 20 controls (patients' siblings: 12 male, mean age 19 +/- 4 years) were studied.
RESULTS: No major side effects were recorded. One patient was unable to perform the test because of anxiety. Limiting side effects were infrequent (3%) and occurred at a dobutamine dose of > or =10 microg/kg, when significant changes of hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters were detectable in all cases. Rest systolic and mean blood pressure and left ventricular fractional shortening were significantly lower in patients than in controls (P <.05), but no differences were found in any of the other indexes of cardiac function between the 2 groups at rest and during each dobutamine infusion step. A similar increase of global left ventricular function (percent of fractional shortening +45% vs +32%) and a decrease of end-systolic stress (-33% vs -29%) were documented. Left ventricular relaxation, early filling, and both relaxation and compliance improved. In all but one patient with reduced global left ventricular function at baseline, time-dependent patterns of hemodynamic and echocardiographic responses to dobutamine were similar. Previously described risk factors for cardiac toxicity did not influence the time changes of the echocardiographic parameters in response to dobutamine.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with controls, most of our asymptomatic childhood cancer survivors, studied an average of 7 years after treatment with anthracyclines, showed normal baseline cardiac function. Our stress test was feasible and safe. Compared with modalities used in other studies, shorter infusion periods with higher dobutamine doses allowed a higher stress intensity to be reached without reducing patient compliance. At dobutamine stress test the response was comparable in patients and controls except for one patient. Previously reported risk factors for cardiac toxicity had no significant influence on stress test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10925349     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.108237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of epirubicin and doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in children and adolescents treated within the German Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study (CWS).

Authors:  W Stöhr; M Paulides; I Brecht; A Kremers; J Treuner; T Langer; J D Beck
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Advanced Echocardiographic Techniques in Detection of Cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Aarti A Patel; Arthur J Labovitz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-04

3.  Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Plana; Maurizio Galderisi; Ana Barac; Michael S Ewer; Bonnie Ky; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Javier Ganame; Igal A Sebag; Deborah A Agler; Luigi P Badano; Jose Banchs; Daniela Cardinale; Joseph Carver; Manuel Cerqueira; Jeanne M DeCara; Thor Edvardsen; Scott D Flamm; Thomas Force; Brian P Griffin; Guy Jerusalem; Jennifer E Liu; Andreia Magalhães; Thomas Marwick; Liza Y Sanchez; Rosa Sicari; Hector R Villarraga; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Assessing the Cardiac Toxicity of Chemotherapeutic Agents: Role of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Timothy C Tan; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2012-12-01

5.  Cardiac complications of chemotherapy: role of imaging.

Authors:  Timothy C Tan; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  Current and emerging modalities for detection of cardiotoxicity in cardio-oncology.

Authors:  Michel G Khouri; Michael R Klein; Eric J Velazquez; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-03

7.  Detection and monitoring of cardiotoxicity-what does modern cardiology offer?

Authors:  Ruxandra Jurcut; Hans Wildiers; Javier Ganame; Jan D'hooge; Robert Paridaens; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Cancer therapy and cardiotoxicity: the need of serial Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Maurizio Galderisi; Francesco Marra; Roberta Esposito; Vincenzo Schiano Lomoriello; Moira Pardo; Oreste de Divitiis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 9.  The utility of cardiac stress testing for detection of cardiovascular disease in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amy A Kirkham; Sean A Virani; Kristin L Campbell
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-01-23

Review 10.  Multimodality Imaging in Cardiooncology.

Authors:  Fausto Pizzino; Giampiero Vizzari; Rubina Qamar; Charles Bomzer; Scipione Carerj; Concetta Zito; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.