BACKGROUND: Previous randomized trials have shown beneficial effects of coronary stenting on restenosis and event-free survival rates. However, it has not yet been fully established if routine high-pressure stenting with an antiplatelet regimen can show similar results. METHODS: We compared the 6-month angiographic restenosis rate and 2-year event-free survival rate in 400 patients randomly assigned tostent or angioplasty. Aspirin and ticlopidine were prescribed in both groups. RESULTS: The procedural success rate did not significantly differ between the stent and angioplasty groups (97.92% vs 97.45%, P = not significant). No stent thrombosis was found. The 6-month restenosis rate was lower in the stent group (18. 18% vs 24.87%, P =.055). At 2 years target lesion revascularization rate was 17.19% in the stent group and 25.51% in the angioplasty group (P =.02, 33% reduction). No significant differences with regard to death and myocardial infarction were observed. Event-free survival rate at 6, 12, and 24 months was 86.77% vs 78.84%, 84.13% vs 76.70%, and 83.07% vs 73.54% for stent and angioplasty groups, respectively (P =.0172). CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes were better in patients who received stent than in those after balloon angioplasty. The difference in 2-year event-free survival rate was explained by a reduction in target lesion revascularization rate in the stent group.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous randomized trials have shown beneficial effects of coronary stenting on restenosis and event-free survival rates. However, it has not yet been fully established if routine high-pressure stenting with an antiplatelet regimen can show similar results. METHODS: We compared the 6-month angiographic restenosis rate and 2-year event-free survival rate in 400 patients randomly assigned to stent or angioplasty. Aspirin and ticlopidine were prescribed in both groups. RESULTS: The procedural success rate did not significantly differ between the stent and angioplasty groups (97.92% vs 97.45%, P = not significant). No stent thrombosis was found. The 6-month restenosis rate was lower in the stent group (18. 18% vs 24.87%, P =.055). At 2 years target lesion revascularization rate was 17.19% in the stent group and 25.51% in the angioplasty group (P =.02, 33% reduction). No significant differences with regard to death and myocardial infarction were observed. Event-free survival rate at 6, 12, and 24 months was 86.77% vs 78.84%, 84.13% vs 76.70%, and 83.07% vs 73.54% for stent and angioplasty groups, respectively (P =.0172). CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month angiographic and 2-year clinical outcomes were better in patients who received stent than in those after balloon angioplasty. The difference in 2-year event-free survival rate was explained by a reduction in target lesion revascularization rate in the stent group.