D Y Loisance1, P G Jansen, D R Wheeldon, P M Portner. 1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, CNRS and Claude Bernard Association, University Hospital Henri Mondor, 51 Avenue du Maréchal De Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, Cedex, France. loisance@univ-paris12.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As of July 1st 1999, 36 European patients have lived for more than 1 year supported by the Novacor wearable electric left ventricular assist system (LVAS). All were unresponsive to maximum medical therapy, prior to implantation. These patients offer an unique opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of long-term ambulatory mechanical circulatory support as a therapeutic option for patients in profound cardiac failure. METHODS: Data was obtained from the Novacor European Registry. RESULTS: At the time of implantation, median age was 55 (18-67) years. Aetiology was ischemic (9, 25%) or idiopathic (26, 72%) cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis (1, 3%). Median duration of LVAS support was 1.49 (1. 03-4.10) years. Eight recipients had LVAS support times >2 years, of which two were >3 years and one >4 years. The median time spent outside the hospital was 1.27 (0.58-3.83) years, representing 82% of the duration of LVAS support. No mechanical failure was observed during the entire observation period. One pump was replaced electively after 3.67 years due to pump driver wear-out. Twelve patients (33%) are currently on support while 17 were transplanted (14, 39%) or weaned (3, 8%). Seven (19%) patients died after a median of 1.24 years circulatory support. CONCLUSIONS: Experience with long-term Novacor LVAS recipients has demonstrated effective rehabilitation in this group of patients with refractory advanced heart failure. This suggests that LVAS therapy may offer a safe and realistic option for patients for whom no other effective therapy is available. The patient sub-population that would benefit most from this therapy remains to be defined.
OBJECTIVE: As of July 1st 1999, 36 European patients have lived for more than 1 year supported by the Novacor wearable electric left ventricular assist system (LVAS). All were unresponsive to maximum medical therapy, prior to implantation. These patients offer an unique opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of long-term ambulatory mechanical circulatory support as a therapeutic option for patients in profound cardiac failure. METHODS: Data was obtained from the Novacor European Registry. RESULTS: At the time of implantation, median age was 55 (18-67) years. Aetiology was ischemic (9, 25%) or idiopathic (26, 72%) cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis (1, 3%). Median duration of LVAS support was 1.49 (1. 03-4.10) years. Eight recipients had LVAS support times >2 years, of which two were >3 years and one >4 years. The median time spent outside the hospital was 1.27 (0.58-3.83) years, representing 82% of the duration of LVAS support. No mechanical failure was observed during the entire observation period. One pump was replaced electively after 3.67 years due to pump driver wear-out. Twelve patients (33%) are currently on support while 17 were transplanted (14, 39%) or weaned (3, 8%). Seven (19%) patients died after a median of 1.24 years circulatory support. CONCLUSIONS: Experience with long-term Novacor LVAS recipients has demonstrated effective rehabilitation in this group of patients with refractory advanced heart failure. This suggests that LVAS therapy may offer a safe and realistic option for patients for whom no other effective therapy is available. The patient sub-population that would benefit most from this therapy remains to be defined.