Literature DB >> 10924972

Importance of the mini-mental status examination in the treatment of patients with brain metastases: a report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 91-04.

K J Murray1, C Scott, B Zachariah, J M Michalski, W Demas, N L Vora, A Whitton, B Movsas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little information is available on the importance of pretreatment Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) on long-term survival and neurologic function following treatment for unresectable brain metastases. This study examines the importance of the MMSE in predicting outcome in a group of patients treated with an accelerated fractionation regimen of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions in 2 weeks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) accrued 445 patients to a Phase III comparison of accelerated hyperfractionated (AH) radiotherapy (1.6 Gy b.i.d.) to a total dose of 54.4 Gy vs. an accelerated fractionation (AF) of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions from 1991 through 1995. All patients had histologic proof of malignancy at the primary site. Brain metastases were measurable by CT or MRI scan and all patients had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of at least 70 and a neurologic function classification of 1 or 2. Two hundred twenty-four patients were entered on the accelerated fractionated arm, and 182 were eligible for analysis (7 patients were judged ineligible, no MMSE information in 29, no survival data in 1, no forms submitted in 1).
RESULTS: Average age was 60 years; 58% were male and 25% had a single intracranial lesion on their pretherapy evaluation. KPS was 70 in 32%, 80 in 31%, 90 in 29%, and 100 in 14%. The average MMSE was 26.5, which is the lower quartile for normal in the U.S. population. The range of the MMSE scores was 11-30 with 30 being the maximum. A score of less than 23 indicates possible dementia, which occurred in 16% of the patients prior to treatment. The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 5 days (range, 0-158 days). The median survival was 4.2 months with a 95% confidence interval of 3.7-5.1 months. Thirty-seven percent of the patients were alive at 6 months, and 17% were alive at 1 year. The following variables were examined in a Cox proportional-hazards model to determine their prognostic value for overall survival: age, gender, KPS, baseline MMSE, time until MMSE below 23, time since diagnosis, number of brain metastases, and radiosurgery eligibility. In all Cox model analyses, age, KPS, baseline MMSE, time until MMSE below 23, and time since diagnosis were treated as continuous variables. Statistically significant factors for survival were pretreatment MMSE (p = 0.0002), and KPS (p = 0.02). Age was of borderline significance (p = 0.065) as well as gender (p = 0.074). A poorer outcome is associated with an increasing age, male gender, lower MMSE, and shorter time until MMSE below 23. Improvement in MMSE over time was assessed; 62 patients died prior to obtaining follow-up MMSE, and 30 patients had a baseline MMSE of 30 (the maximum), and, therefore, no improvement could be expected. Of the remaining 88, 48 (54.5%) demonstrated an improvement in their MMSE at any follow-up visit. Lack of decline of MMSE below 23 was seen in long-term survivors, with 81% at 6 months and 66% at 1 year of patients maintaining a MMSE above 23. Analysis of time until death from brain metastases demonstrated that decreasing baseline MMSE (p = 0.003) and primary site (breast vs. lung vs. other p = 0.032) were highly associated with a terminal event.
CONCLUSION: While gender and perhaps age remain significant predictors for survival, MMSE is also an important way of assessing a patient's outcome. Accelerated fractionation used in the treatment of brain metastases (30 Gy in 10 fractions) appears to also be associated with an improvement in MMSE and a lack of decline of MMSE below 23 in long-term survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10924972     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00600-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  26 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy and chemotherapy of brain metastases.

Authors:  R Soffietti; A Costanza; E Laguzzi; M Nobile; R Rudà
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Neurocognitive function and quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis after treatment with intra-operative cesium-131 brachytherapy: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Anthony Pham; Menachem Z Yondorf; Bhupesh Parashar; Ronald J Scheff; Susan C Pannullo; Rohan Ramakrishna; Philip E Stieg; Theodore H Schwartz; A Gabriella Wernicke
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Cognition and quality of life after chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (RT) vs. RT for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas: radiation therapy oncology group trial 9402.

Authors:  Meihua Wang; Gregory Cairncross; Edward Shaw; Robert Jenkins; Bernd Scheithauer; David Brachman; Jan Buckner; Karen Fink; Luis Souhami; Normand Laperriere; Minesh Mehta; Walter Curran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases in the brain: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Marcello Marchetti; Ida Milanesi; Chiara Falcone; Michela De Santis; Luisa Fumagalli; Lorenzo Brait; Livia Bianchi; Laura Fariselli
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Predicting compliance and survival in palliative whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases.

Authors:  Sebastià Sabater; Encarna Mur; Katrin Müller; Meritxell Arenas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  The value of 4-month neurocognitive function as an endpoint in brain metastases trials.

Authors:  Shunsuke Onodera; Hidefumi Aoyama; Khin Khin Tha; Naoki Hashimoto; Atsuhito Toyomaki; Satoshi Terae; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Role of radiation therapy in palliative care of the patient with cancer.

Authors:  Stephen T Lutz; Joshua Jones; Edward Chow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Assessment of function and quality of life in a phase II multi-institutional clinical trial of fractionated simultaneous in-field boost radiotherapy for patients with 1-3 metastases.

Authors:  Glenn Bauman; Slav Yartsev; David Roberge; Robert MacRae; Wilson Roa; Valerie Panet-Raymond; Laura Masucci; Brian Yaremko; David D'Souza; David Palma; Tracy Sexton; Edward Yu; Jason R Pantarotto; Belal Ahmad; Barbara Fisher; A Rashid Dar; Carole Lambert; Gregory Pond; Larry Stitt; Keng Yeow Tay; George Rodrigues
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  Physical examination of the female cancer patient with sexual concerns: What oncologists and patients should expect from consultation with a specialist.

Authors:  Stacy Tessler Lindau; Emily M Abramsohn; Shirley R Baron; Judith Florendo; Hope K Haefner; Anuja Jhingran; Vanessa Kennedy; Mukta K Krane; David M Kushner; Jennifer McComb; Diane F Merritt; Julie E Park; Amy Siston; Margaret Straub; Lauren Streicher
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Prognostic indices for brain metastases--usefulness and challenges.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.