Literature DB >> 10924578

Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance.

E Lechevallier1, M André, D Barriol, L Daniel, C Eghazarian, M De Fromont, D Rossi, C Coulange.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and clinical role of fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses, with helical computed tomographic (CT) guidance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 63 patients (mean age, 62 years), 73 biopsies were performed. The median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Tumor biopsy was performed with an 18-gauge needle by using helical CT guidance in an outpatient setting. Two to four cores per tumor were obtained.
RESULTS: Biopsy material was insufficient for analysis in 15 (21%) procedures. The median tumor size of failed or successful biopsies was 3.0 or 4.8 cm, respectively (P =.03). A benign lesion was found at eight biopsies. Two samples were suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RCC was found in 38 biopsy samples. The remainder were transitional cell carcinoma, metastasis, lymphoma, or sarcoma. Twenty-six patients underwent nephrectomy. The accuracies of biopsy for histopathologic and Fuhrman nuclear grade evaluation were 89% and 78%, respectively. For tumors of 3.0 cm or smaller or larger than 3.0 cm, 37% (11 of 30) or 9% (four of 43) had failure of biopsy, respectively (P =.006). No substantial morbidity occurred.
CONCLUSION: Fine-needle biopsy with helical CT guidance is accurate for the histopathologic evaluation of renal masses without morbidity. Indications are renal lesions that do not have the typical radiologic features of RCC, Bosniak category III or IV cystic lesions, and locally advanced or metastatic RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10924578     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au01506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Veltri; Irene Garetto; Irene Tosetti; Marco Busso; Alessandro Volpe; Donatella Pacchioni; Enrico Bollito; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multi-colour FISH on preoperative renal tumour biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of uncertain renal masses.

Authors:  Aliaksei Chyhrai; Jimsgene Sanjmyatav; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Olaf Reichelt; Heiko Wunderlich; Thomas Steiner; Enis Tanović; Kerstin Junker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The role of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Amy Y Li; David P Wood
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  The role of renal biopsy in small renal masses.

Authors:  Rodolfo Burruni; Benoit Lhermitte; Yannick Cerantola; Thomas Tawadros; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Dominik Berthold; Patrice Jichlinski; Massimo Valerio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yan Zhong; Haiyi Wang; Yanguang Shen; Aitao Guo; Jia Wang; Suhai Kang; Lu Ma; Jingjing Pan; Huiyi Ye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses.

Authors:  Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours.

Authors:  F Cornelis; E Tricaud; A S Lasserre; F Petitpierre; J C Bernhard; Y Le Bras; M Yacoub; M Bouzgarrou; A Ravaud; N Grenier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Microarray gene expression profiling using core biopsies of renal neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Jonathon A Ditlev; Min-Han Tan; Jun Sugimura; Chao-Nan Qian; Jeff Cooper; Brian Lane; Michael A Jewett; Richard J Kahnoski; Eric J Kort; Bin T Teh
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 9.  Biopsy of renal masses: when and why.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Watchful waiting in the treatment of the small renal mass.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.