Decision time and prey gregariousness influence attack probability in naïve and experienced predators.

Aposematic coloration often has an element of conspicuousness. One suggested benefit of conspicuousness is that it enables the prey to be detected at a greater distance, allowing a predator more time to make a correct decision about attacking it and thus reducing possible recognition errors made by predators. I conducted an experiment, with chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, as predators on live aposematic and nonaposematic prey, to investigate the effects of decision time and signal size on predator sampling behaviour. The chicks were subjected to different degrees of competition to influence how quickly decisions had to be made. Chicks in four treatment groups, either in the presence or absence of a competing chick, were presented with either solitary prey or prey in groups. In the presence of a competitor, chicks attacked the prey more often and more quickly and needed more attacks before they started to avoid the prey. With prey in groups, chicks took longer to attack, attacked less often, learnt to avoid prey more quickly and killed fewer aposematic prey. This experiment provides evidence for the importance of time and signal size for predators' attack decisions. More time to view prey prior to attack could produce a stronger image and thus encourage avoidance learning and produce a stronger neophobic avoidance effect. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.