Literature DB >> 10923613

No dose-dependence of DNA double-strand break misrejoining following alpha-particle irradiation.

M Kühne1, K Rothkamm, M Löbrich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether an explanation for the high effectiveness of densely ionizing radiation with regard to complex biological endpoints can be derived from measurements of radiation-induced double-strand break (DSB) misrejoining.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Misrejoining of radiation-induced DSB in normal human fibroblasts was determined by comparing hybridization analysis of large restriction fragments as a measure for correct rejoining, with results from a conventional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis technique (FAR) that measures total DSB rejoining. In order to investigate DSB misrejoining at doses for which chromosome aberration data are available, a dose fractionation protocol was applied so that the number of DSB at any given timepoint was low but the cumulative amount of misrejoined DSB sufficient for detection and precise quantitation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: After an acute 80Gy alpha-particle exposure and a repair incubation period of 24 h, 50% of all initially induced DSB were misrejoined, in agreement with data obtained for X-rays. X-irrradiation with 16 x 5 Gy, 8 x 10 Gy, 4 x 20 Gy, or 2 x 40 Gy and repair incubation of 24 h following each individual dose fraction was recently reported to yield misrejoining frequencies that strongly decrease with increasing fractionation (Löbrich et al. 2000; Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 27, 59-68). In the present study, constant misrejoining frequencies of 50% were observed after alpha-particle exposure with the same fractionation protocol. This difference between alpha-particles and X-rays is in accordance with the high biological effectiveness of densely ionizing radiation and provides a direct link between misrejoining of DSB and cytologically visible exchange aberrations. Further evidence suggests that if the same dose range is compared, the number of misrejoined DSB exceeds the number of microscopically visible aberrations by an order of magnitude for both radiation types, probably reflecting the high resolution of the hybridization approach compared with cytological techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10923613     DOI: 10.1080/09553000050050909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  11 in total

1.  Heat effects on DNA repair after ionising radiation: hyperthermia commonly increases the number of non-repaired double-strand breaks and structural rearrangements.

Authors:  R A El-Awady; E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks misrepair is not compromized by broken DNA in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  G Alsbeih; W A Brock; N Terry; M D Story
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Ines Krüger; Larry H Thompson; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The LET dependence of unrepaired chromosome damage in human cells: a break too far?

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Mutagenesis and repair by low doses of alpha radiation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Theodore T Puck; Robert Johnson; Patricia Webb; Helen Cui; Joseph G Valdez; Harry Crissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  DNA double-strand-break complexity levels and their possible contributions to the probability for error-prone processing and repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Agnes Schipler; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A new model of biodosimetry to integrate low and high doses.

Authors:  Mònica Pujol; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Pedro Puig; Roser Puig; María Rosa Caballín; Leonardo Barrios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Polo-like kinase 3 regulates CtIP during DNA double-strand break repair in G1.

Authors:  Olivia Barton; Steffen C Naumann; Ronja Diemer-Biehs; Julia Künzel; Monika Steinlage; Sandro Conrad; Nodar Makharashvili; Jiadong Wang; Lin Feng; Bernard S Lopez; Tanya T Paull; Junjie Chen; Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Bcl2 inhibits recruitment of Mre11 complex to DNA double-strand breaks in response to high-linear energy transfer radiation.

Authors:  Maohua Xie; Dongkyoo Park; Shuo You; Rui Li; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Ya Wang; Paul W Doetsch; Xingming Deng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Authors:  Jessica S Helm; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.