Literature DB >> 10923607

Humoral and cellular responses to histamine and pollen allergen in a skin chamber model: effect of mizolastine.

L Michel1, M Murrieta-Aguttes, F Jean-Louis, D Levy, L Dubertret.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mizolastine is a new non-sedative antihistamine and antiallergic drug proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.
OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively explore the time course of mediator release and cell recruitment during allergen challenge and the effects of mizolastine on the event, using the skin chamber model.
METHODS: Twelve pollen-sensitive patients (23+/-6 years) were included in a double-blind crossover study. Patients received 10 mg mizolastine or placebo once daily in the first 4-day period and, after a 3-week washout period, vice-versa in the crossover period. On day 4 of each period, a non-invasive in vivo skin chamber technique was used to determine the alteration of vascular permeability, mast cell mediator release, the release of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule -1(sICAM-1) in skin sites challenged with exogenous histamine or grass pollen allergen extract, over an 8-hour period.
RESULTS: Challenge with allergen-induced significant mast cell activation, as indicated by the release of histamine, tryptase and LTC4, in chamber fluids 2 hours after initiation of the allergic reaction and during the following 6 hours. Both exogenous histamine and allergen induced significant vasodilatation, which was sustained during the 8-hour challenge, as indicated by the accumulation of protein in the chamber fluids. Likewise, both histamine and allergen induced the release of significant amounts of ICAM-1 throughout the 8-hour period. Mizolastine significantly inhibited the histamine- and allergen-induced extravasation (after 2 hours, P = .003; after 8 hours, P = .009; after 2 hours, P = .044; after 8 hours, P = .003 respectively) and the histamine- and allergen-induced--ICAM-1 release (after 2 hours, P = .004; after 8 hours, P = .05; after 2 hours, P = .03 respectively).
CONCLUSION: Mizolastine strongly inhibited the local response to histamine in this skin chamber model with, of interest, inhibition of the release of the soluble adhesion-molecule ICAM-1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10923607     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62436-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  2 in total

1.  Comparative activity of cetirizine and mizolastine on histamine-induced skin wheal and flare responses at 24 h.

Authors:  A Purohit; M Mélac; G Pauli; N Frossard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  New insights into the second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  G M Walsh; L Annunziato; N Frossard; K Knol; S Levander; J M Nicolas; M Taglialatela; M D Tharp; J P Tillement; H Timmerman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.