Literature DB >> 10923573

The ultrasound-assisted physical examination in the periodic health evaluation of the elderly.

T Siepel1, D S Clifford, P A James, T M Cowan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Except for specific procedures such as blood pressure measurement, the conventional physical examination (PE) does not have sufficient sensitivity to be useful as part of the periodic health evaluation. Ultrasound has demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity in numerous studies but has been too expensive to be widely employed in health screening. The purpose of our study was to determine whether an examination in which conventional and ultrasound techniques are blended and applied by a primary care physician might be feasible and useful in the periodic health evaluations of senior citizens.
METHODS: Seventy-two patients presenting to a community-based family physician for periodic health evaluations received an ultrasound-assisted physical examination (USA-PE) from a second family physician. The results were reported to the primary physician, and the outcomes were tracked for periods of up to 2 years.
RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 72 patients (31%) had abnormalities found by the USA-PE that were not apparent during the conventional PE. Five of these patients (7%) had serious conditions that received prompt treatment with apparent benefit. Findings included endometrial carcinoma, abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid stenosis, hydronephrosis, and urinary retention.
CONCLUSIONS: The USA-PE found more abnormalities in this group of patients than conventional PE. Whether it can improve outcomes for senior citizens undergoing periodic health evaluations in a cost-effective manner is yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10923573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  6 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography or auscultation? How to evaluate systolic murmurs.

Authors:  Clarence Shub
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Point-of-Care Ultrasound in General Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Camilla Aakjær Andersen; Sinead Holden; Jonathan Vela; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Martin Bach Jensen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Canadian national survey of point-of-care ultrasound training in family medicine residency programs.

Authors:  Taft Micks; David Braganza; Shuo Peng; Patti McCarthy; Kyle Sue; Pamela Doran; Jeffrey Hall; Harland Holman; Danielle O'Keefe; Peter Rogers; Peter Steinmetz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: Focused Versus Generalized Approaches to Scanning.

Authors:  Michael Tanael
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  USEFUL: Ultrasound Exam for Underlying Lesions incorporated into physical exam.

Authors:  Jon Steller; Bianca Russell; Shahram Lotfipour; Graciela Maldonado; Tim Siepel; Halsey Jakle; Stacy Hata; Alan Chiem; John Christian Fox
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-09

6.  A Prospective Evaluation of Point of Care Ultrasound Teaching in Switzerland.

Authors:  Connor Byrne; Nico Kahl; Brian Knight; Monica Lee; Stephanie Morley; Shadi Lahham; Roland Bingisser; Maxwell Thompson; Inna Shniter; Victoria Valdes; John C Fox
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.